796
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Nearly a third of Americans – 30% – say people may have to resort to violence in order to get the country back on track, according to the latest PBS News/NPR/Marist poll.

It’s a sharp rise from 18 months ago, when 19% of Americans said the same.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

The problem with all of this is that the right is literally saying this exact same thing.

We dismiss it because it's ludicrous, because they HAVE all the power, their guy IS the deep state that controls everything, but our media world has fashioned a narrative for our stupidest segment that they're the oppressed underdogs.

Meaning, no matter what happens, even if we get our best outcome and drag this administration onto the White House lawn, we still have to live next to millions and millions of people who think we've been planning to do that to them for decades now.

There is no good solution that doesn't involve some kind of new leadership that needs to be built from the ground up and will likely take generations to nurture and develop.

[-] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

we still have to live next to millions and millions of people who think we’ve been planning to do that to them for decades now.

They already believe that. There's no point in asking your oppressor if they are uncomfortable with you getting oppressed. Just ask any school bully.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It's not a matter of asking permission OR rolling over and letting them get away with being stupid, violent, orcs, it's a matter of needing a particular brand of leadership that can rein in our worst people's worst impulses and being patient and focused enough as a political side to stay united and focused on making changes that benefit everyone. Otherwise we're descending into a state of pure social decay as the system grinds to a halt because we don't trust each other and we don't even have clear sides in the conflict.

I don't see our current population of the US being able to do any of this, so I don't see revolution, even small-scale or "soft" revolution as being a viable option. We have to all get a lot more social and accepting of each other, we need to use our social skills and networks to rebuild the governing bodies in our communities on local levels and install representatives that actually represent us, and this has to be done in a way that eliminates the influence of corporations but also still raising money needed for political action. So yeah, we're cooked.

[-] fishy@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago

So what though? If it gets to the point of having to violently overview the government, we're past the point of precedent. We can just use their beloved AI to scrub social media profiles and purge them from the voting registry. Sure they'll believe that was the plan all along, but we'd have a few decades where the scales were tipped so far in our favor that their children and grandchildren could be properly educated without all the revisionist bullshit.

[-] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

That's the key, right? You've gotta build a society afterwards that doesn't perpetuate the cycles of abuse and enlightens people with education. One that doesn't exploit anybody and doesn't have a class structure that divides people. That's the only way you can build a society that can reliably raise every child healthily. Any society that strives for equality like that will necessarily have to ignore the voices of those who want to hold it back.

[-] AAA@feddit.org 3 points 1 year ago

There's ample of evidence that a couple of decades to reeducate their children and grandchildren simply isn't enough or doesn't work.

We had a couple of decades to educate everyone about fascism,... and yet we're here.

[-] fishy@lemmy.today 6 points 1 year ago

We allowed them to rewrite the history books. We're here because education was so fucking bad. I grew up in California and was taught that MLK's I have a dream speech solved racism in America and that the civil war was about states rights. There's lots of room for improvement.

[-] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Trying to educate people who insist on being lost beyond salvation is a waste for everyone involved. If they love the sword so much, let's let them die by it and let's move on past their era.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Then you begin a thousand-year cycle of violence and reprisal for that violence until our great great great great grandchildren have no idea why they hate this group of people they live next to.

There's a precedent for this, you might have heard of it.

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
796 points (98.8% liked)

News

39411 readers
1942 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS