937
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 63 points 3 years ago

Even if it kills (which it likely will), our track record shows that didn't care enough about that, and in a decreasing manner. So it'll only be worse.

[-] Chriskmee@lemm.ee 8 points 3 years ago

Pretty sure every virus has killed people, from the cold, to flu, and of course covid. It feels like now the death rate for the latest variants of covid are pretty comparable to the flu, the virus has lost a lot of its killing power over time.

[-] eatmyass@hexbear.net 17 points 3 years ago

Except the flu does not regularly disable those who it infects

As someone who wound up with chronic fatigue syndrome after getting covid, thank you for this. This piece of shit virus is worse than most people want to admit.

[-] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago

Of course it does, the flu kills millions and leaves even more disabled.

[-] eatmyass@hexbear.net 8 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)
  1. the sheer number of Covid infections has made long Covid into a global crisis

  2. amazing that you recognize the existence of not only long Covid, but other post-viral illnesses, and think it gives weight to your “Covid is no big deal” argument

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 12 points 3 years ago

Pretty sure every virus has killed people, from the cold, to flu, and of course covid.

False equivalency intensifies

[-] Chriskmee@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago

What is false about that statement? Viruses kill, that's not false at all. Just because covid has killed at higher rates doesn't change my statement.

The point is that a virus being deadly is just a fact of all viruses.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago

What is false about that statement? Viruses kill, that's not false at all. Just because covid has killed at higher rates doesn't change my statement.

You're the living embodiment of this emoji morshupls

The point is that a virus being deadly is just a fact of all viruses.

That is a false equivalency, emphasis equivalency. Spare us your liberal sophistry.

[-] Chriskmee@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago

I think you need to look up the definition of false equivalency, it is not an apple to orange kind of thing to say all viruses can kill. I'm not denying some kill more than others, but they all kill. If you can't understand this fact, I don't know what to tell you.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago

I think you need to look up the definition of false equivalency

You're stating that all viruses kill (which may have some holes in it already) therefore all viruses are technically the same, which ignores the differences in damage they do to people.

If you can't understand this fact, I don't know what to tell you.

If you had any actual point to make with your pedantic bullshit, I didn't see it. You're just textually masturbating as far as I can tell.

[-] Chriskmee@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

You're stating that all viruses kill

Yes, I am, and I'm pretty sure that's a fact.

therefore all viruses are technically the same

That's not what I'm saying at all, does saying all people die mean all people are the same? Does saying all murders kill mean they are all the same? No, there are obviously differences.

which ignores the differences in damage they do to people.

The fact I said isn't about differences in damage, facts don't have to say everything to be facts. My fact also isn't saying or implying that they do the same damage.

If you had any actual point to make with your pedantic bullshit, I didn't see it. You're just textually masturbating as far as I can tell.

Look at the context of who I was responding to. They were basically saying that if it kills we should wear a mask, I pointed out that All viruses kill and we don't wear masks because of those, so just the fact that it kills isn't enough.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 1 points 3 years ago

Look at the context of who I was responding to. They were basically saying that if it kills we should wear a mask, I pointed out that All viruses kill and we don't wear masks because of those, so just the fact that it kills isn't enough.

And there's the false equivalency that you're trying to banish with sophistry magic.

They said "it kills" in a non-precise pedantically-incorrect way about something that is dangerous and you're doing victory laps congratulating yourself on a reddit-logo tier "technically correct" masturbatory moment.

[-] Chriskmee@lemm.ee 1 points 3 years ago

Again, I think you need to look up the definition of false equivalency, what I am saying isn't that.

Define dangerous, because I wouldn't call current strains of covid dangerous. The hospitalized death rate isn't that far off the flu at this point. It used to be more deadly, but it's just not anymore.

But hey, at least we can agree I'm technically correct.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 0 points 3 years ago

Again

You're being dense on purpose because it's that important for you to congratulate yourself on a silly pedantic thing that none one else cared about, not the person you were being smug to in the first place, and not to me.

But hey, at least we can agree I'm technically correct.

Your self-congratulatory narcissism is noted. congratulations

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 years ago

Death rates aren't a feeling. I want some hard numbers.

I feel like we just don't care if we live or die anymore.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 15 points 3 years ago

Fun fact: the CDC readjusted what the 'normal' rate of deaths is to include the years of the pandemic so now it's harder than ever to find hard numbers because "excess deaths" was one of the last ways to get any information at all!

[-] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 years ago

Plus a world wide fast aging population would increase the death background number even if nothing else happens.

Anything that doesn't make an observable, statistically significant difference, has no cause to further impose restriction on how people live their lives

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago

Plus a world wide fast aging population would increase the death background number even if nothing else happens.

Sharp edges don't happen from demographic trends. This is pure rationalization.

Further than what?? What restrictions??

And what are you implying? Covid has no observable affect on public health? Tell that to the millions of people still getting disabled every year.

[-] Chriskmee@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago

I know I've read reports about the latest variants being much less deadly. I did see one study recently which for patients presenting to hospital covid was a few percentage points more likely to result in death compared to hospitalized flu patients. There were a lot more covid patients though.

Found it:

death rates among people hospitalized for COVID-19 were 17% to 21% in 2020 vs 6% in this study, while death rates for those hospitalized for influenza were 3.8% in 2020 vs 3.7% in this study

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2803749

So there is some data backing up the feelings I've gotten from everything I've been hearing and seeing.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 years ago

So that's almost twice as bad as the flu.

[-] Chriskmee@lemm.ee 1 points 3 years ago

I mean, that's one way to look at it. I looked at it as only a couple percent higher death rate than the flu. Either way, a little less than 2x is way better than like 5x worse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] glingorfel@hexbear.net 4 points 3 years ago

I'm not sure how severe an effect this would have on the numbers, but the death rate would non-negligibly go down after millions of the most vulnerable people died in the first wave. As well, the newer variants get more contagious and bypass immune responses more easily, and we're taking way fewer precautions as a society. so 6% is a lower percent but still an incredibly high number

[-] Chriskmee@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago

I saw it as an evolutionary benefit to be less deadly. The way I'm seeing this, the virus's purpose in life is to spread, so a higher infection and contagious rate with less death rate is ideal from an evolution standpoint.

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

Ideal for it, not ideal for anyone who enjoys the full function of their mind and circulatory system.

The mind thing isn't a dig at you btw, it's a reference to the brain fog

[-] SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org 5 points 3 years ago

That's the same shit that businesses were pushing last time because they didn't want to close for a few months, ended up making everything worse.

[-] Piers@beehaw.org 1 points 3 years ago

Yup. More effective action faster would have had a higher same-day-you-make-the-decision cost but would have been tremendously less harmful economically to all the entities blocking it for fear of the economic impact to them. They were digging a mass grave and then leaping into it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago

It's important to note that every state I'm aware of has long ended their testing and reporting, literally doing the Trump thing. So we actually have no idea what the numbers are.

[-] Chriskmee@lemm.ee 1 points 3 years ago

The numbers I've seen are from hospitalized patients, which should still be tracked, and tracked in a similar way to the flu. It doesn't give us the full story for sure, but it gives us something to compare.

[-] Piers@beehaw.org 1 points 3 years ago

The issue is that it happens out of sight out of mind so it's just an abstract statistic that it's easy to ignore or pretend away. If Covid-19 killed you by making your head spontaneously fall off we'd have eliminated it or reduced it to a few tiny isolated pockets simply by the change in the public's attitude to it. But because it kills you "quietly" out of sight in a hospital bed or at home, people were able to just convince themselves everything is basically normal.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
937 points (93.3% liked)

World News

41646 readers
131 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS