728
submitted 11 months ago by blueworld@piefed.world to c/news@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/post/533816

...

CNN asked Miller whether the Trump Administration will abide by a district judge’s order blocking the Guard’s deployment in Oregon. “Well, the Administration filed an appeal this morning with the Ninth Circuit,” Miller began. “I would note the Administration won an identical case in the Ninth Circuit just a few months ago with respect to the federalizing of the California National Guard.”

Then, Miller said: “Under Title 10 of the U.S. Code, the President has plenary authority, has—” before making an abrupt stop. Miller blinked several times, with anchor Boris Sanchez calling out his name, though he still did not respond.

...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plenary_power

A plenary power or plenary authority is a complete and absolute power to take action on a particular issue, with no limitations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 207 points 11 months ago

The executive is a co-equal branch of government. We don't do kings here. We kill kings.

We also kill Nazis. Per long tradition. We don't debate them. We don't platform them. Nazis are guilt free kills. Don't even count as human.

[-] Ging@anarchist.nexus 177 points 11 months ago

We have never killed kings here. We also stayed out of Nazi affairs for many years. The sentiment is nice, but more than misleading. You got weird history books anon

[-] DaMummy@lemmy.world 107 points 11 months ago

Not only that, but we also support most dictatorships around the world, we fund genocide, overthrow democratically elected governments, and assassinate people like Lincoln, JFK, & MLK.

[-] fascicle@leminal.space 22 points 11 months ago

Oh shoot you're right, I guess we should all relax and get back to work

[-] FunctionallyLiterate@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

THAT'S the spirit!!

[-] Ging@anarchist.nexus 3 points 11 months ago

I thought that's what I read, thanks for the reality check

[-] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 66 points 11 months ago

Maybe he meant Martin Luther King?

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago
[-] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 9 points 11 months ago
[-] FunctionallyLiterate@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

He wasn't killed... barely.

[-] Ging@anarchist.nexus 3 points 11 months ago

I thought these words exactly but felt they may be too harsh lol

[-] galoisghost@aussie.zone 55 points 11 months ago

We don't do kings here. We kill kings.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 65 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Literally never killed a king in their history. The closest they got was killing aboriginal chieftains. Muricans just got salty because the King of England refused to let them colonize the native tribes in the great lakes region (which the crown had declared a self-governing protectorate). Americans declared a revolution and cloaked it in jingoistic hoopla about liberty. They also tried (and failed) to enlist Quebec to join them.

[-] voxthefox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 11 months ago

Hey to be fair the US government has killed 1 king in their history, it was just MLK..

[-] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Love it. Sincerely I do.

American: kill kings!

European: amateurs.

Lol.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Muricans just got salty because the King of England refused to let them colonize the native tribes in the great lakes region (which the crown had declared a self-governing protectorate).

Wait wait wait. The Brits were the good guys (in this one, very specific, instance)?

[-] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

Not the only time. Another example is the West Africa Squadron, where a small part of the British Navy tried to block all slave traffic coming out of West Africa.

The UK has done some insanely horrific things, but it does have some legitimate bright spots in there.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Broken clock, etc. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Proclamation_of_1763

[Historians] have argued that colonial resentment of the proclamation contributed to the growing divide between the colonies and the mother country. Some historians say that even though the boundary was pushed west in subsequent treaties, the British government refused to permit new colonial settlements for fear of instigating a war with Native Americans, which angered colonial land speculators.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 42 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Don't even count as human.

... People can be evil (and even deserve execution) without dehumanizing them. You know, the exact thing we hate them for doing?

[-] pahlimur@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

People calling you a nazi sympathizer don't know that most people who actively participated as members of the German nazi party were 'normal' people. They lived normal lives, followed the law, and existed in normal society. In reality, most people supporting our current nazi problems will need to be deprogrammed and forcibly pulled back into an accepting society. Its what happened in Germany, not many nazis were charged with crimes.

[-] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Similar shit happened in Indonesia after the genocide. People had to go back to being neighbours with somewhat typical people who were former state sanctioned serial killers and enablers. Germany tried to deprogram the youth in the '50s, but yeah. Didn’t stick, for various reasons. Harsh reality.

Still, no society has recovered from fascist or similar regimes without at least some targeted pruning of the tree of life. Putin SHOULD obsess about what happened to Gaddafi and the like. Society has to remember or, well, here we are again.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one 39 points 11 months ago

I know a lot of other social medias censor this idea, but throughout history, a lot of human rights only came about when people rose up to defend it.

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

The US has put or helped keep more kings in power than they have taken out of power. Also, I would like to point out that King George III did not die in the American revolutionary war.

[-] AreaKode@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

The intolerance will be met with equal intolerance.

[-] bookmeat@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 11 months ago

Indeed, America accepted thousands of Nazis with open arms, from Germany after the second world war. That worked out well.

[-] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 2 points 11 months ago

Tbf they made some damn good rockets once you got them to shut up about the whole antisemitism thing.

The US probably wouldnt have made it to the moon without having them. History is far more complex and nuanced than we often make it out to be

[-] bookmeat@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 11 months ago

True, though they weren't all rocket scientists.

[-] justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io 8 points 11 months ago

The French killed kings and nazis. The British killed kings and nazis. The Polish killed kings and nazis. The Russian killed kings and nazis. And replaced their king with fucking Stalin. The Canadians rebelled and won against a king(winning the right to create their own government) and killed nazis. (You get the idea)

The US was tricked by their upper class into rebelling, and then replaced the king with a pseudo-king. The US started WW2 helping the Nazis

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

We kill kings.

Are you in France? The last king killed by his own subjects was French king King Louis XVI. After that it was probably Tsar Nicholas II of Russia if you count him as a king. America sought independence from monarchy and never took the war to Britain.

I get what you're saying, but I think the whole "mindless, indiscriminate killing of people against us" narrative fits far better with people who fasten political flags to the beds of their pickup trucks and collect guns so they can shoot democrats alongside Jesus come Armageddon day.

It's not that I think there shouldn't be capital punishment for heinous actions, but with both political sides calling each other "nazis" and the right saying the left is violent while ramping up violence, we have to be better about rhetoric and the chance for ambiguity. Lets get better.

[-] verdi@feddit.org 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's the story you've been told, it is in fact false. You save and help Nazis flee prosecution and the only kings you ever killed were the original inhabitants of America that you genocided in your manifest destiny.

No amount of chest thumping is going to erase the fact you're already living in the 4th reich and the best you can do about it is shoot some random blogger in the neck. And then you have the gall to ridicule the French...

edit: Like someone mentioned below, the only king you killed was MLK.

[-] Sideshow_B00b@lemmy.zip 4 points 11 months ago

But.. but.. ”zey vere just folloving orders”

Punch-a-nazi would be a great substitute for whack-a-mole BTW

[-] confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Nazis are certainly human. Not disagreing with the rest of your statements but denying reality doesn't help anything.

[-] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

People who refuse to relinquish Nazism need to be publicly hanged. Nazism is intentionally harmful.

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
728 points (99.2% liked)

News

39243 readers
2446 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS