this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
1230 points (97.3% liked)

People Twitter

10312 readers
453 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

idk, it seems to have described so much about the universe with so few input. And can just study itself like in "Gödel's incompleteness theorems" to give constraints on what you aspire to achieve with it. I'd call math/logic/reason fairly strong by themselves.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

with so few input

Yes, few inputs. Not none.

I'd call math/logic/reason fairly strong by themselves.

What does strong mean in this context? It's a very useful tool. No one is denying that. It just doesn't tell us anything about the universe without input from that same universe.

[–] zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago

hmm, idk, okay.