this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
27 points (96.6% liked)

Television

2795 readers
273 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities

Television Communities

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.
  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.
  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.
  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.
  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.
  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags.

Matrix Link

List of Best Rated TV Series as voted by the Fediverse

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Juice@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

To me, racism is an objective social condition to overcome. Race has a quality that is very personal to people so it can't be overlooked. I take it very seriously but I dont want to reduce all society's problems to race. You seem aware that doing so creates its own problems, I agree with the sentiment but does not warrant complete dismissal of race and racism as objective social conditions. It is an over correction.

Because of this over correction, you see racism and anti-racism as qualities of the other, in this case, i am an other with an anti-racist quality.

Rather than fighting a system of racism, that exists as part of a larger system of oppression, you seem to have adopted a posture that any mention of race or racism is a personal failing, an idea that can be defeated with individual logic, rather than an objective condition to be fought with solidarity and practice. Because racism is everywhere, you see anti-racism everywhere, but since it is, to you, only an individual opinion in other people, your only course of action is to respond to them one-on-one. In order to avoid appearing explicitly racist, and to effectively .debate your own alienated opinions against others, you have to steel man and think about this stuff all the time.

I don't have to do that. I just listen to people, read books, and report on my own limited understanding. I don't have to work half as hard because my perspective doesn't disappear other people's experiences, it naturally includes them. I don't have to search frantically for details to question, or ways to feel superior. I can just listen and discuss. If done correctly I don't frustrate myself or other people nearly as much, I can just be dumb and live my life and speak my mind, and if there's something new I need to learn, I can just do that instead of frantically rejecting objective truth in order to maintain attachment to a system that hates and oppresses us.

I can have strong principles and take care of my friends and family, unlike the millions of families who lost a loved one to racist conspiracy theories like qanon. People who thought they had the world figured out while losing what really matters while selling themselves and their communities out for a glimpse of a false feeling of community.

In other words I've known a lot of different kinds of people, and the ones who are most distracted, haunted, and sad, are the ones who buy into the lies presented to us by the oligarchy and their proxies.

I just hate to see someone work so hard to remain attached to dastardly, corrosive lies. But of course I am clearly an over thinker so maybe I lie to myself a little as well, to justify my own individualistic indulgence.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

does not warrant complete dismissal of race and racism as objective social conditions

When did I advocate for that?

[–] Juice@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Actions speak louder than words

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Juice@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ive given a lot to this discussion and you've offered very little. I'm pretty sure you're just messing with me. Please engage with something worthwhile or disengage.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Volume =/= value.

It's clear you have no clue what my actual take or position is here and just want to post endless walls of preachy text.

Please engage with me instead of whatever shadow-boxing you're doing or disengage.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You're not offering me anything. I dont over write in order to dominate, I am just very inefficient writer and tend to edit out 3 pages for every 5 that I write, on average. You put preachiness on me like you perceive I put things on you.

I've offered personal details and my own philosophy though, where you've typically mostly given one line snarky responses or questions. So to me you seem unserious and uncommitted to mutual understanding. Maybe that's wrong but its all I have to work with.

If this isnt worth either of our time then what is the point?

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It's very simple: I was calling out the person I replied to for having a kneejerk reaction to seeing an article where a black person was arrested.

At best it's vapid virtue-signaling, at worst it diminishes the real examples of systemic racial injustice that happen all too often.

You then chose to jump in, assume my views, and then chastise your own assumptions about me.

Of course I'm going to defensively insist that you point out examples of what you're accusing me of. Why should I bother engaging with all your strawmen?

[–] Juice@midwest.social 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

So that is interesting. What is wrong with signalling virtue? In your previous comment, you said that volume =/= value. To me it seems you don't like when people try to be social and expressive, at least around certain topics.

You haven't elaborated on what racial injustice looks like to you, you're just gate keeping other people's definitions. Those other definitions of racial injustice are vapid, but your own secret measure is beyond reproach. You ensure it is beyond reproach by never describing it or allowing it to be challenged. This implies a fear that you might be criticized.

Skepticism isn't analysis. To me, it seems like you're all too willing to diminish real examples of systematic racism. Again, by going after "virtue signallers" you imply that your own position is the real virtuous one. And since you won't elaborate anything about it, then it is vapid, at least to me. As you can see I have no problem explaining my reasoning, and you won't even really challenge it. So what's the point?

You can't or won't prove your own ideas so they don't exist outside your idealistic little thought cave. The most generous interpretation I can make based on our conversation is that you just dont really care about other people. That's sort of normal, unfortunately, but it doesnt make you correct or even relevant.

I was playing games online a while back and a group of young people were in chat, and called one of the kids a "try hard". The kid's response: "I've never tried hard at anything in my life." That is how your virtue signalling comment appears to me. I want people to signal virtue, and you clearly believe in virtue/value. Signalling it helps virtuous people to find one another, and together we might accomplish something. For some reason, youve internalized it as a bad thing and I really don't understand why.

Please elaborate on who the victims are of that comment you originally responded to. Or is that another idealistic little hypothetical covering for your own lack of critical thought, as it appears?

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

What is wrong with signalling virtue?

The emphasis is on vapid. Do you really not understand why people respond negatively to someone interjecting with some hardly-relevant comment just to make themselves look good?

you said that volume =/= value. To me it seems you don’t like when people try to be social and expressive, at least around certain topics.

That was specifically about you saying that you had "given a lot". Just because it's "a lot" doesn't mean it's valuable.

You haven’t elaborated on what racial injustice looks like to you, you’re just gate keeping other people’s definitions.

Actually I haven't done either. Because it's not particularly relevant to my point.

Those other definitions of racial injustice are vapid

I didn't say the definition was vapid. I said the act was vapid. Again, a wall of text about something I didn't say or do.

Please elaborate on who the victims are of that comment you originally responded to.

Again: at best, the people who have to rifle through those inane comments, and at worst, the people who's actual problems are diminished because the signal-to-noise ratio is out of whack.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So your victims are hypothetical, but by your own admission, there are actual victims of systemic racism.

The idea that you're saving people from inanity is very funny. How inane are we being right now?

What a joke

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

So your victims are hypothetical

Nice disingenuous framing.

Like I said, it's very simple. The only reason we're still talking about this is because you're obsessed with writing walls of text to shadowbox with.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Like I thought. Just a debate pervert.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Lol, and now you're gonna do that debate pervert thing where you must have the last word so you'll just keep repeating that phrase.

Do it. Get that last word. Walk away with something.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Lol I'm debate perving on you. I'm gonna send you hot debate nudes that you can master debate to