this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
255 points (96.7% liked)
Music
11897 readers
104 users here now
Per community feedback, low-effort GenAI posts are disallowed.
↳ Our family Communities:
➰#Music
Music.world - !music@lemmy.world
Jazz -!jazz@lemmy.world
Album Art Porn - !albumartporn@lemmy.world
Fake Album Covers - !fakealbumcovers@lemm.ee
Obscure Music - !ObscureMusic@lemm.ee
Vinyl and LP's - !vinyl@lemmy.world
Electronic Dance Music - !edm@reddthat.com
60's Music - !60smusic@lemmy.world
70's Music - !70smusic@lemmy.world
80's Music - !80smusic@lemmy.world
90's Music - !90smusic@lemmy.world
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The added bonus is that you also know it isn't AI generated music.
The last Beatles song is heavily touched by AI, long since the death of John and George.
My mom was a big Beatles fan so I've listened to them my whole life. Good stuff.
But that "new" song sucked sooo bad. And it won a Grammy? What a joke. Gotta be one of the worst Beatles song ever released
FWIW the AI was really only used to extract "clean" vocals from the demo. Similar to Spleeter but obviously a lot more advanced. Restoring audio quality is a great use of machine learning
They also quantized both John and George's recordings with AI. Not as bad as actual generative AI but also contrary to what made the old recordings great.