25
High disk read compared to seeding speed
(lemmy.today)
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
FUCK ADOBE!
Torrenting/P2P:
Gaming:
💰 Please help cover server costs.
![]() |
![]() |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
Yeah but youd think I would fill some sort kf buffer up eventually, if I'm limited by bandwidth, right?
Am I actually just limited by DiskIO so I'm always behind? My memory usage is around 250MB.
No. There's no point in filling more than the protocol buffers if you can't empty them. Loading a huge file into memory that won't be used right away is a waste.
You've already said your read speeds are better. Memory usage doesn't seem relevant here.