151
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 14 points 10 months ago

Of course it will crash eventually. It will recover and rinse repeat the bs all over again. Had a coworker who all he did was talk about stocks and how everyday someone said the market cant sustain this massive growth but it did for years until covid happened.

When it does it Just would be nice if it took the dbags who made housing prices go up 3x with it.

[-] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago

Normally maybe, but Peter Thiel has supported getting rid of the federal reserve for a very long time. Honestly wouldn't put it past him to intentionally try to crash the stock market. I find the timing of the rushed preliminary approval of his new bank this week very odd. I don't think this is another 2008.

Realistically, the best case scenario is this is somewhere between 1930 and 2008, but skewing much closer to 1930. Worst case is it could be worse than 1930 bc the people running the government into the ground (and intentionally crashing the market with these terrible AI investments) don't want it to recover, they want to destroy it and replace it with their own system which they fully control.

I honestly wonder if the majority of these data centers being built are simply gigantic crypto mining factories, and AI was kind of a red herring the entire time.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

but Peter Thiel has supported getting rid of the federal reserve for a very long time.

What? That's insane because that is not even possible, unless USA wants to give up on having it's own currency!

[-] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

He opposes centralized banking, and wants to replace it with cryptocurrency. Hence why he's opening the first U.S. crypto bank.

However, as always, if he succeeds it seems the most likely outcome is the U.S. economy is just centralized through the first bank of Peter Thiel.

It's his typical B.S. hidden under the guise of libertarian beliefs. It's not ok for the government to do it, but it's somehow ok bc it's his corporation not the government.

It's "libertarian" despite there being no chance of competition bc he also completely controls the market and the government. I guess if you also had his wealth and connections, you could easily just ask your friend the president to get your cryptobank approved too.

So, Thiel gets to control everything and everyone, and in return we get no public accountability or protection. Sweet.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

It’s not ok for the government to do it, but it’s somehow ok bc it’s his corporation not the government.

That's the typical mindset of a super-capitalist. They are batshit insane, thinking money has more rights than people.

[-] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's also how oligarchs have managed to convince people that supporting their policy = supporting libertarian policy.

Step 1: The government is inefficient. It should be run like a business.

Step 2: The government should be of the people, by the people, for the people. SCOTUS has the brilliant realization in 2010 that corporations are people too.

Step 3: Government interference into people's lives should be limited = any government regulations on businesses impede freedom and progress.

Step 4: Government of the corporations, by the corporations, for the corporations. Corporations control the market, manipulate laws to eliminate competition, and collect our tax money but cannot be regulated or held accountable by the people.

Step 5: Peter Thiel warns the Antichrist will actually look like big government regulations on the economy, surveillance, and AI tech. If we allow these regulations, an authoritarian government is inevitable. Coincidentally, Thiel just happens to dominate the "free" market, and has used the government ties he purchased to establish his businesses, secure government contracts, and eliminate competition.

However, an authoritarian nightmare dystopia with inescapable big brother surveillance can't be authoritarian because he's a private business owner who hates "big government." He just happens to have big government contracts.

[-] rozodru@piefed.social 3 points 10 months ago

well considering that Thiel is insane, this tracks. This is a man that A. believes in the Anti-Christ and B. is convinced said Anti-Christ will be returning any day now and C. it all relates to the tech industry.

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago

sounds really possible given the status of the administration actively choosing to make things worst.

It's totally crypto. This timeline is full of scam and scum.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2025
151 points (94.2% liked)

News

39069 readers
2195 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS