this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2025
19 points (100.0% liked)

movies

3784 readers
295 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] auzzy@feddit.uk 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Often, I'm in the same boat as you. For example, Skinamarink is one of the worst offenders I've seen in recent years. If a movie does it once or twice, I don't mind it, as it can soften you up to allow more clever scares to get further under your skin, or have you on edge whenever the score cuts out. But doing it too much ruins the effect.

There are ones I think are genuinely good, though. Ones without that loud audio stab, or where it comes slightly delayed such that the image already spooked me and the noise hits it home, work for me. I think of a moment in Hereditary when you all of a sudden see movement over a character's shoulder in a darkened room that had appeared empty (avoiding details for spoilers). It's more earned, because the terror spreads like a wave through the audience as people realize it at different times, as the movie doesn't call attention to it, but if you're watching the screen, you'll see it eventually.

[–] HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social 2 points 9 months ago

It is fascinating to me that you mentioned "Hereditary", as that's the flick I had in my mind as "excellent jump scares" while writing the comment. There's a scene early on - possibly the one you’ve mentioned - that soundlessly had the hair on the back of my neck on-end. Beautifully done.