this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
827 points (96.2% liked)

World News

32365 readers
240 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jeanma@lemmy.ninja -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

just pointing out that corrupt behavior doesn’t negate the science itself.

But when corruption doesn't let the science happens? You know, in 2020.

[–] Silverseren@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

The science has been done by dozens of independent scientific teams around the world for decades. They have repeatedly shown the lack of health impact from aspartame.