this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
238 points (96.5% liked)

Green - An environmentalist community

5328 readers
1 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!


RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith


Related communities:


Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The “gigantic” power of the meat and dairy industries in the EU and US is blocking the development of the greener alternatives needed to tackle the climate crisis, a study has found.

Cutting meat and dairy consumption also slashes pollution, land and water use, and the destruction of forests, with scientists saying it is the single biggest way for people to reduce their impact on the planet.

“The power of the animal farming sector, both in the US and in Europe, and the political influence they have is just gigantic,” said Prof Eric Lambin, who conducted the study with Dr Simona Vallone, both at Stanford University, US.

The researchers concluded that “powerful vested interests exerted their political influence to maintain the system unchanged and to obstruct competition created by technological innovations”.

Lambin said: “We found that the amazing obstacles to the upscaling of the alternative technologies relates to public policies that still massively fund the incumbent system, when we know it’s really part of the problem in terms of climate change, biodiversity loss and some health issues.”

Alex Holst, at the Good Food Institute Europe, said: “While European investment in sustainable proteins has increased in recent years, this study shows the sector is still only picking the crumbs off the EU’s table.


The original article contains 761 words, the summary contains 212 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] FredericChopin_@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Shouldn’t the first is be are. I suck at grammar, but shit if journalism isn’t dead.

[–] RufusLoacker@feddit.it 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, because the subject is "the power", which is singular.

[–] FredericChopin_@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Huh…

Thanks for pointing that out. I had to read it again a few times to get it. It still feels like it doesn’t flow as much with is.

I wonder is that a me problem and that it sounds correct to most people, or just a curiosity of the language.

Also, is the subject of the sentence always definite or can it sometimes be ambiguous?

[–] spez@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago