this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
110 points (96.6% liked)

movies

3778 readers
828 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

While I like the original two Mummy movies (Scorpion King was OK), I am not sure what the point of remake or continuation would be.

[–] Maven@piefed.blahaj.zone 34 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The point is that I want Brendan Fraser to have more money and I love him

[–] thejoker954@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Thats about the only reason I perked up when I saw the headline.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

On that note I'd love a Monkeybone sequel.

I accept that it will be terrible, I just want it.

[–] Maven@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Monkeybone wasn't terrible!

It wasn't a well acted or constructed story with amazing dialogue but it set out to be an incredibly weird niche movie with a specific vibe and it nailed that vibe perfectly!

10/10 movie in my books. It did exactly what it was planning to do.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Oh, I agree. I just think it was lightning in a bottle that can't be captured twice. I just want someone to prove me wrong.

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Making money for the IP owner.

[–] jbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I would prefer if this wasn't the only accomplishment of a hypothetical sequel.

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The people making sequels only want to accomplish that. That’s the whole point of sequels and franchises.

Nobody in charge is thinking: “gosh that’s an important or interesting story that has some more depth in it. We should explore that concept in a new way”

It’s always: “that movie sold enough to justify risking money on producing another product that sells just as much”

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What is the point of any book, movie, song, piece of art?

[–] jbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

That's a very good question that doesn't really have an answer.

I am just not a fan of random sequels, remakes and faux-adaptions (e.g. Foundation or The Man in the High Castles).

Make a sequel by all means, but make it a unique experience, make it something new, give people that "wow, I didn't expect that!" feeling.