1078
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 94 points 11 months ago

It's clearly not AI because it doesn't have weird uncanny and wonky shit. Also the text on the monitor is readable even though it's blurry

[-] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 21 points 11 months ago

Ai image generators can pretty reliably do text now

[-] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 13 points 11 months ago

Not at that scale, they can do larger text fine but at a certain size it just breaks down

[-] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

However, it is cool that she recreated that AI look to trick them.

[-] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

It's way less recognizable as an AI "art" style to me tbh. Maybe the studio ghibli one? But I haven't really seen art from that one and it even sounds like a stretch

[-] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

it does look like that AI version of Ghibli. not like Ghibli directly

[-] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Exactly what I thought about the text

this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
1078 points (99.0% liked)

People Twitter

10492 readers
869 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician
  1. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS