46
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kersplomp@piefed.blahaj.zone -4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

However, it is a patronizing stance to blatantly state the actor’s sexual consent was violated, as it further objectifies the actor as little more than an (implied defenseless) woman being victimized.

The women said they didn’t know. And that is next level mental gymnastics to claim that I’m the one objectifying, and not the people literally reducing them to objects by sharing their nudes like trading cards against their wishes

this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
46 points (100.0% liked)

Decline into censorship

1300 readers
35 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS