457
Zohran Mamdani’s Proposal For A Millionaire Tax
(www.fascinatingworld.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2025
457 points (99.4% liked)
politics
31153 readers
3221 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Yep. Millionaires threaten to move away if they're taxed, but they won't. The convenience of having their high value properties in highly sought after areas, where all the services they use are present, is too enticing, and even a hefty tax won't be a deterrent.
Just imagine how much upheaval it would cause you to move a few states over. For a millionaire... it's the same except they're used to so much beyond basic survival - their parties, their exclusive clubs, exclusive gatherings, private boxes in theatres, the list goes on.
Do you really see such a person moving to Bumfuck Nowhere, Nebraska, just because that town doesn't tax millionaires? Do you really see them giving up 80-90% of the "rich life" just to save their wealth? Hell nah. As long as you're not explicitly threatening to tax them out of existence, they'll stay. Because unlike the average people they can afford that extra expense.
But of course they don't want to, they just yap around threatening the move without committing to it.
A lot of millionaire wealth is tied to where they live. A New York lawyer or doctor can't just move to Miami and expect to have the same level. Business owners could potentially move, but they still would need to keep traveling back and forth. Ultimately, their social life and lifestyle is where they already liveand being the one who moved because "is expensive" it would be seen as cheap.
FYI when we’re talking about taxing the rich and wealth we’re not talking about doctors and lawyers even if they still make a fuck ton because they are still getting paid for their labour and they need to work in order to maintain their lifestyle even if they would be considered rich.
What we’re talking about are people who make their living through their capital I.e. due to the exploitation of other people.
This article is about an income tax. An additional 4% tax on income over 1 million dollars annually.
This article is not about a wealth tax.
2% according to the article, not 4%.
??
Oh, I was referring to the article in the post. You were referring to the article in the comment. 🙃
Nice, now everyone is correct. Love to see it!
A quick search suggests most New York lawyers (avg $176k/yr) and surgeons (avg $300k to $750k) aren't going to be be affected.
Yeah. We usually consider lawyers, doctors, tech people, academics at fancy universities etc. to be rich. But in the grand scheme of things, they're upper middle class at best. The real rich are all people with generational wealth coming from businesses.
Who considered these people to be rich? Rich people don't have to work. Those are working professionals. Manny of them have high debts for the beginning decade of their careers, too
People born before the 2010s, roughly. Doctors and lawyers were at one point considered two of the highest earning professions and it's only been recently that college debt has really been considered a real issue rather than an excuse Millennials made up because they would rather complain about being poor than lift themselves up by their bootstraps.
For the Baby Boomers, these professions allowed them to buy lots of assets that have since appreciated in value and become generational wealth, and they think the world still works that way.
This is not about wealth though, but income instead.
I doubt those income millionaires can just leave New York and be better off than paying an additional 2% income tax while staying in NY.
In all likeliness they'd have much more net loss from leaving NY than from additional measly 2% tax.
I mean yeah, sure, go ahead and move to Bumfuck and try to figure out what to do with all that money.
And even if some of them really move: is it worse them not paying taxes while not being there at all?
I don't see the the core of their threat.
The idea is that "rich people spend their money" - which, let's be honest, is blatantly untrue.
The rich don't spend their own money. They trade favours. Hell, if you have $1mil on your hand, you can easily walk into a "rich people bank", open an account and get free shit every month, beyond the very generous interest rates. Free concert/theatre tickets, and such. It's like a casino hotel that tries to get you to stay with the freebies, but on an "I have a few million dollars in your bank" level.
Frankly said, whether they spend their money or not is their business. If they are involved in shenenigans like you described that needs to be regulated, because it sure looks like tax evasion.
And regarding the proposed tax (quoting the linked article): "The Millionaire Tax will impose an additional 2% income tax on the top 1% in NYC, who are earning over $1 million per year".
So this tax in no way designed to tax their wealth, but merely their income by another measly 2%.
Nobody will become poor because of this. Some income millionaires just become slightly slower even more rich than they already are.
Have them move elsewhere and see whether they can keep their annual income in the millions there.
I, for one, am willing to call their bluff.
And once that is done, implement a wealth tax for the people who own x million USD.
To keep them from freaking out, it can be as low as 5% annually, because that would still allow them to generate a net increase of their wealth.
If they complain, increase the tax and start draining their fortune.
Mist of their true income won't be touched. You don't get taxes for holding stock. You don't get taxed for borrowing. So, a lot of billionaires borrow against their stock to have spending money without paying income taxes.
And that is the real reason they want interest rates to be low. So the leech class can get better rates on their untaxed income from borrowing against stocks.
Borrowing against stocks should be considered realizing gains from them and taxed as such.
Ok, let's call it 'taxable income' then to have a basis of what is going to be taxed (more).
Also isn't it so petty to admit you (would) move because you don't want to shell out your bit for your community? Like isn't that incredibly cheap? Don't you like living in New York? Don't you like your city?
It's like the rich guy passing on the collection plate at church type move.
Well, the rich didn't get rich by giving away their money.
To them it's a status symbol - like how Apple products used to be status symbols for the plebeian (aka us).
Having multimillion dollar supercars, villas, mansions, seven bedroom apartments, etc., works well, but you're only truly rich if you can show off how you didn't actually lose any value to get those benefits. How you didn't need to spend a single penny of your wealth to live the rich life.
Yeah I guess I should stop ascribing any kind of communalist value systems to them. The like of you and I aren't in the group they consider their community.
Many millionaires moved out of France after new taxes. 1,400 just in 2025.
Oh no. How will France survive now!
What were those new taxes? Here we’re only talking an additional 2% on top of whatever nyc s state and local tax is that could be what 15%? Noticeable but not a dramatic change
They were already getting taxed 45%