625

China has brought millions out of poverty. The US has not – by choice (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

221 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Despite the US’s economic success, income inequality remains breathtaking. But this is no glitch – it’s the system

The Chinese did rather well in the age of globalization. In 1990, 943 million people there lived on less than $3 a day measured in 2021 dollars – 83% of the population, according to the World Bank. By 2019, the number was brought down to zero. Unfortunately, the United States was not as successful. More than 4 million Americans – 1.25% of the population – must make ends meet with less than $3 a day, more than three times as many as 35 years ago.

The data is not super consistent with the narrative of the US’s inexorable success. Sure, American productivity has zoomed ahead of that of its European peers. Only a handful of countries manage to produce more stuff per hour of work. And artificial intelligence now promises to put the United States that much further ahead.

This is not to congratulate China for its authoritarian government, for its repression of minorities or for the iron fist it deploys against any form of dissent. But it merits pondering how this undemocratic government could successfully slash its poverty rate when the richest and oldest democracy in the world wouldn’t.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Lol.

"West Taiwan" is a funny meme,

but as a anti-CCP Chinese American, I cringe every time I hear white westerners on the internet say this, especially in a serious discussion.

It just make you look un-serious.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I visited Hong Kong SAR and the PRC numerous times for business, which included several 6 to 7 week stays in Guangdong (Shenzhen area). I always looked forward to the weekend in Hong Kong, because I considered the city to be far more civilised than the shit I saw in the PRC. Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore are far superior to anything under CCP rule.

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

I mean, yes I agree that CCP sucks, but please don't "West Taiwan" under a serious news article lol. You're not gonna convince any Mainland Chinese when you argue like that.

Usually when you say stuff like that, people double down on their beliefs, so you'd just inadvertently make someone more pro-ccp rather than making them more open minded.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 10 months ago

you know these people like to fanatasize about ccp/russia and but never would live there or properly intergrate into the culture. its like that 90-day fiance, the white girl went to russia to pick upa dude, and she was "infatuated' with russia but would never live there permanently or learn the language.

this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2025

625 points (93.0% liked)

News

39411 readers

2125 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world