144
WhatsApp "interoperability"
(lemmy.nz)
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
Pretty sure signal refused to integrate
Signal should be subject to the same law. So I hope all it takes is someone making a bridge that forces Signal to open up as well.
I don't want to chat with people on WhatsApp with Signal. I don't want Meta linking my metadata. Interoperability will only keep people from switching to better platforms
While I agree with your sentiment, no interoperability obviously hasn't made people switch to better platforms either. The only difference is that without interoperability, I'm forced to still use WhatsApp to communicate with those unwilling / unable to switch.
I would disagree. I've gotten quite a few people in my life to use Signal
this part of the DMA only applies to “gatekeepers”, which are very large providers. the biggest barriers to being a gateway are (imo) turnover of > €7.5bn, 45m active monthly users in the EU
State mandated XMPP. I didn't know I'm cool with authoritarianism until now!
WhatsApp uses the same encryption protocol as Signal. Theoretically they should already be interoperable.
Except then the WhatsApp front end could hoover up all the data, or the report feature would upload the entire convo, or the long list of exteremely serious exploits WhatsApp has had
Which would that be?
The Signal Protocol.
As they should, considering Meta would then have access to all that user data. They're just fundamentally different systems.