view the rest of the comments
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Remember when Biden was too old to be president?
And he was too. It was a huge contributing factor to how the Dem's threw the election.
The big factor is that he is a blue dog democrat.
The entire reason Obama selected him as VP was an olive branch to the corporate sellout branch of the Democratic Party who were worried that he was "too progressive".
You seen to be suggesting that Obama was not himself a corporate sellout...
Ahh, but we didn't realize it yet.
Dude campaigned on "change". We didn't know until his victory speech was the standard US exceptionalism and imperialism.
Really? Cause I remember Clinton pulling the exact same playbook out on us...
Which is weird, since Obama was arguably more regressive.
Yes, the campaign was very different from how he governed. Which is part of why we're here
I would have been just fine with the Democrats running him, TBH. If something were to happen to him, there is a line of succession and he's not surrounded by total buffoons and Nazis, unlike Donvict.
Well yes most anyone here knows he's 1/100th as bad as trump. and honestly in practice as president, I have to say he may actually be the best president in my lifetime. Doesn't change the fact that his age was a huge problem in his campaigning. and put simply the democratic party's obvious coverup of his age, that all fell appart on debate day did a pretty awful weakening to the image of the democratic party, which I would say, contributed to a good portion of swayable voters staying home or voting for trump.
Whoosh
Rules like that only apply to everyone else, not Republicans, who are special people.
If they amendment 25 him or if he keels over whatever, we all get to look forward to this asshole, I guess...I'd be curious if he carries on with extremely idiotic and unpopular things like tarrifs and golden ballrooms and bombing fishermen and talking about annexing Canada/Greenland or Panama, too. Same with all the stupid vendettas and childishness like putting up a picture of an autopen instead of Biden's picture or trying to charge Biden with "fraud" (LOL) for the autopen.
BTW, all of their stupid rhetoric about the autopen is even dumber than their stupid fixation with teleprompters, except autopens have been used without fanfare for even longer than the teleprompter.
But when Democrats use technology that has been in use for decade upon decade, idiotic right wing mouth-breathers can be trained to think it's bad.
Taco has a meltdown about a teleprompter, accusing everyone of some kind of plot at the UN over it, but when Obama used a teleprompter it was like the end of Western civilization itself, because it was a Blah guy running as a Democrat.
These people don't even have any internal consistency. They are reprogrammable meatbags. If Taco uses an autopen and even talks about how he uses it, they won't bat a fucking eye.
No way he gets anything done. He'd be a lame duck until the next election, and then he'd be history.
Let's hope so. The guy is way too cozy with the likes of Thiel and Musk and all that freakishness combined with way too much money that they represent.
I mean, I'm not looking for more Curtis Yarvin or lame-brained insanity like The Sovereign Individual injected into my life or American institutions....but a "JD" "Vance" presidency just might bring it about.
Taco can bully the Republicans with the power of the purse and threatening the funding of primaries against them if they don't go along. Sure the base firebombing their families is a factor, too. But Musk and Thiel obviously have very deep pockets and could do similar bullying. Musk in particular also has his share of crazy stans and incels that could also probably be whipped up into threats of violence against non-compliant pubbies.
They said the same about Bernie too and honestly I think he would have won.
Bernie is so clearly still with it
Biden had a reasonable sound mind, whereas the orange felon/rapist/liar has dementia, visions of grandeur and lacks a soul.
But he didn't.
These fossils are all too old.
His mind runs circles around Trump's though and that's the comparison being made