2
submitted 1 year ago by davel@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

you completely dense morons

You not wanting to understand what we're telling you does not make us the morons.

edit:

In the sense that the government can't seize your shit [...] that doesn't mean we can't tax the shit out of billionaires

Doesn't it? Where do you draw the line between taxes and government seizure, especially in the context of capital owners? Also, wouldn't it be far more effective for the government to simply own the means of production and operate at the behest of the people? Does taxing capitalists more while still allowing them to have full control over the means of production - which they'll use to influence the people and government in their favor - not simply set up the same situation we find ourselves in now, just some amount of time down the road?

I would say it does set that up (in fact it has in the past, just look at what was in the new deal and how it's been eroded since it was signed. Assuming you're familiar with US history...), and that is why liberalism is incompatible with anti-capitalism.

[-] Quadhammer@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

No, liberalism means INDEPENDENT of the economic system I believe in personal liberty. Billionaires shitting on everything INTERFERES with my and my peoples personal liberty therefore it must be destroyed

[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You might feel that way, but committed ideological liberals would strongly disagree with you.

[-] Quadhammer@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

And those liberals are who?.. JohnTravolta.gif

[-] causepix@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh you know, only the ones making the laws.

[-] Quadhammer@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

So which neoliberal dems are referring to themselves as liberals? No, it is a derrogatory perjative to both the nazis and the leftists at this point, by design. Most of the dems are going to claim to be either progressive or conservative

[-] Kurroth@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

You basically want the government to only intervene in your life or people's life in ways you agree with.

If you want to call yourself a liberal, you are a pretty piss poor one.

[-] Quadhammer@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Yes I would prefer the government to protect my rights not actively attack them. If that makes me "a pIsS Poor LiBeRaL" then so be it

this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)

World News

42030 readers
453 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS