this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
350 points (99.2% liked)

movies

3774 readers
559 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Michael Dorn said "nope, no way, not doing that again, wait, how much?" (Wrt DS9)

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 37 points 8 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, in the near 40 years between the beginning of TNG and Picard S3, makeup tech has improved vastly.

In the 80s we were talking about heavy, hot prosthetics under very bright, hot lights.

Today, those prosthetics are slim, silicone moulded to the person's face, with skin-friendlier glues, much less makeup required to hide it, and better CGI that helps eliminate makeup mistakes.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Dorn had been begging for his own show for decades

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Like the Sulu series, that ship has unfortunately sailed.

So many good ideas left behind because of the cheap bastards controlling the brand.

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not only will this now accelerate, any fresh IP will get the dreaded production interference with MAGA themes

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 5 points 8 months ago

The name "Enterprise" was from the start a right wing capitulation to avoid a moral panic over space communism and a diverse crew.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah, Dorn never had a problem with the makeup, he had a problem with Worf getting bodied and overruled every episode.