738
I dunno
(lemmy.nz)
A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules
Nope! If you looked more carefully you'll find some of them are photo's and scans. You also seem to be forgetting that every modern textbook comes with a PDF as well ๐
says the actual fraud who keeps ignoring that there is no exponent in a(b+c) ๐
So in other words, you weren't able to. Also, it doesn't say that - well done on missing the point for a third time in a row ๐
So you think 2(3x4x5)=(2x3x2x4x2x5) is totally fine? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA ๐๐๐
Weird then that it's in Maths textbooks isn't it, that 2(3x4x5) is in fact only equal to 2(60)? ๐
says person showing they don't know the difference in meaning between "means" and "equals" ๐
Yep.
Yep.
Yep.
Nope! When you finally discovered that they were both valid, even though only a couple of textbooks I posted specifically said to Distribute first. We in fact teach students to simplify before Distributing - less working out, less mistakes with signs.
That's right, just facts, as per Maths textbooks ๐
a(b+c)=(ab+ac), same thing I've been saying the whole time
and facts
Nope! Never said anything of the sort, liar. I have said the whole time that Multiplication is a special case, to which you claimed there was no special case.
No Multiplication. It's not complicated ๐
I already did. Not my fault you don't understand the difference between Addition and Multiplication ๐