160
Tucker Carlson’s Canada Invasion Rhetoric and the MAGA Fracture
(primerogueinc.com)
What's going on Canada?
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Baseball
Basketball
Curling
Hockey
Soccer
💻 Schools / Universities
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
🗣️ Politics
🍁 Social / Culture
🌐 Other Relevant Communities
Rules
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
Banning stuff isn't the answer. I believe in actually free speech and discourse. Our media up here is already so saturated with American thinkslop, the CBC is our last stand (and under constant attack by Conservative grifters).
I believe in the right for Tucker to say what he's got on his mind, just as much as I believe in the right to point our fingers and say, "get a load of this fucking idiot." Buddy looks like an absolute tool bag, and obviously is just karma farming. That's how these people like trump and him get so rich, they karma farm this shit. That's true evil by the way.
Twitter/YouTube isn't free speech. It's not open discourse. It is an algorithm that decides what to show people based on how engaging it is, individually.
I can't emphasize this enough; there is nothing fair about it, and it's not a "debate" because it sycophantic by design. Any right to free speech shouldn't be equated with that.
Ok but banning speech goes both ways, hey!? That means the speech you find acceptable might come into question by others.
It's a slippery slope. Maybe the slipperiest. Freedom of speech also means sometimes you need to hear some stuff that makes you want to vomit.
As soon as some speech is chosen over another, it's not free. As long as a platform decides what is acceptable, it's not free. YT and Twitter actively vet who is allowed to speak on their platforms, which means it's not free. It also means they are somewhat condoning the speech on their platforms.
It's already not free.