395
submitted 9 months ago by hamid@crazypeople.online to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca -5 points 9 months ago

You should really counter point with your own source if you're going to tell someone their source is insufficient

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago

This dead horse was already beaten half a day ago in this thread.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago

No. That's not remotely how that works.

[-] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca -5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I would argue that Wikipedia while not a great primary source has pretty stringent guidelines for providing sources in its articles. So you've answered with a thought terminating cliche and refused to elaborate. In other words you're incorrect and too fragile to admit it.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Imagine if every idiot could just say "You didn't debate me that means reality is what I claim!" and have it be true

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

That's not what a thought terminating cliche is. And no, the fact I didn't bother to get bogged down in whatever tedious secondary argument you want to have does not remotely mean my initial point is wrong.

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
395 points (83.2% liked)

Memes

57004 readers
610 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS