405
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
405 points (99.3% liked)
politics
30941 readers
2961 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
As much as I want this to be true, it appears to be faked. It was postmarked 3 days after his death and didn't have his inmate number which is required on all prison mail. Everything is spelled correctly which doesn't match anything else he ever wrote, and it was posted from a Virginia processing station nowhere near either of them. Also, there is no (known) prior connection between Nassar and Epstein.
Also, now there's a highly publicized fake piece of evidence that implicated Trump, which is awfully convenient for the rest of the files
Just because the doj says something is fake doesn't actually make it so. And no not all mail has to go through the doc if you've got a lawyer worth a shit. So the real question is where was Epsteins lawyer based.
I don't believe the doj saying it's fake, I'm looking at it from an objective standpoint. The doj is corrupt and can suck my balls and taint for all I care.
JE was a very well known and reviled person by 2019 and so was Trump. Is it that hard to believe someone would post a super incriminating letter from "Jeffrey Epstein" to another sex pest who was prominently in the news at that time in order to try to link them and Trump?
I think Trump is a rapist pedo and was heavily involved with the trafficking but I think this particular piece of evidence ain't it
Which is that one
Hopefully they’ll slip up in their need to disprove this and leak actual information.
I’m all for flooding the zone with bullshit to force them to disprove it by implicating him elsewhere. This is why discovery is so priceless to a lawsuit.