372
submitted 8 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

He really is using them to make war on America

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 15 points 8 months ago

Elections are run by the states. State officials decide to hold them and run them. If a Republican-majority state doesn’t, then they don't get representation in Congress.

[-] Bristlecone@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

I get that, but he has already talked about trying to cancel them and declaring a state of emergency to justify it multiple times. I'm not disagreeing with you, I'm just saying that relying on our system to correct this mistake hasn't worked so far and I'm starting to doubt that it's going to hold up to correct it at all at this point. I wouldn't put it past him to mobilize whatever willing troops he can to directly stop local elections. I also live in a newly potentially purple state, so I guess I'm pretty dubious of everything surrounding this upcoming midterm regarding normalcy

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

Cute how you think this cannot be worked around.

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

It really can't very easily they've tried many many times

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago

They stopped an elected member from being sworn in for quite a while recently. This proved that there's nothing stopping them from doing this. There's no reason they can't do the same on a larger scale.

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Well, here's the thing. Johnson was not required for her to be sworn in, it could be done in another manner, I want to say a federal judge can do it, but my memory may be hazy.

this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
372 points (99.2% liked)

politics

31115 readers
2416 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS