649

Republican men seem massively troubled about their masculinity — and that's literally causing death and suffering

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 3 years ago

California, Oregon, Washington, Illinois, Hawai'i, New York, Massachussets, New Jersey, and that's just off the top of my head.

Now, can you point out where in the Bruen decision it was stated that the second amendment only applies to handguns intended for self-defense?

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

The original argument was, 'how will I protect myself."

In a self defense situation I believe a hand gun will suffice.

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 3 years ago

You believe it will. But that is not always the case. And self defense from what, precisely?

Moreover, self defense was not the reason for 2A. It is a reason, but not the reason. 2A is what allows community activists to band together to protect people giving out food to homeless people, or prevent fascists from beating drag queens that are trying to read stories, because--in both cases--the cops are on the side of the oppressors.

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 1 points 3 years ago

Mm. Ok, but I am much more practical then you are. So, I'm not sure I am equipped to address all your concerns about what rights are being infringed and what a well regulated militia is. What commas go where...

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 3 years ago

"Well regulated" meant trained. Simple as that. So the people that wrote the constitution were saying that since trained riflemen were critical to winning the revolution, people should be able to keep practicing.

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago

I guess I am a bit more critical then you as well. No worries, we won't reach consensus.

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
649 points (91.0% liked)

politics

31115 readers
2601 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS