430
Do you accept cookies?
(lemmy.nz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
430 points (98.2% liked)
memes
22809 readers
2505 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Consent-o-matic allows me to access the contents without accepting your policies. Win for me
Not sure if what I use is better, but I just use the optional cookie filter lists on Ublock Origin.
Consent-o-matic will actively reject cookies while most cookie filters hide the UI element or just presses OK.
They're going to get blocked anyway by uBlock Origin if it blocks their scripts
Advertisers are like rapists. You not saying no means yes to them.
Saying no to a rapist also means yes. So, apt analogy.
That filter doesn't reject cookies. It just stops you from seeing the pop-up from my understanding.
Which is meant to be the same as a rejection. If they have correctly implemented it is another thing.
Yeah, so I disabled those filters in uBlock Origin. I'd rather be annoyed by the pop-up and know I rejected what I could instead of being unsure.