638
submitted 8 months ago by tonytins@pawb.social to c/politics@lemmy.world

Trump has said that the United States shouldn’t have midterm elections this year because midterm voters often vote against the president’s party. Democratic congressional leaders have said they expect Trump to disrupt and dispute the midterms.

“It’s some deep psychological thing, but when you win the presidency, you don’t win the midterms,” Trump told Reuters in a recent interview. He then boasted that his presidency had accomplished so much that “when you think about it, we shouldn’t even have an election.”

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) told the Associated Press that Democrats are concerned that Trump will try to prevent open and fair midterm elections.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Enekk@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

I hate defending non-voters, but a large number of people are unable to vote or aren't well informed enough to know what's going on. In the former camp, there are lots of people who can't get to the polls because voting day isn't a holiday or because there aren't enough polling locations in their area, or because they are sick, etc. etc. Most of the time politicians actively work to make it harder to vote.

Of course you can feel however you'd like about the latter camp, but being uninformed is also being encouraged. People are often undereducated. Some people just don't consume news. I'd be willing to bet there are some people who didn't know an election was going on and some who couldn't name the president.

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Fuck off. That's not a fucking excuse at this point. A third of the population allowed this to happen. The end.

[-] Enekk@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

This is the exact sort of response I expected.

My point here is that there is a lot of class struggle that actively works to prevent individuals from voting. Putting the blame just on those people misses the mark and will not fix things.

Take one example. Some people get to make a choice. Take time off of work, stand in line for literal hours, and try to vote or feed their family today. Is the solution to blame the individual or to address how fucked up the system is that prevents them from voting?

Yes, there are idiots who could have voted, but didn't. They deserve derision. But, if we don't identify that voter suppression is real, if we place the responsibility on people entirely, we play directly into the hands of those who don't want people voting.

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 3 points 8 months ago

If there is an overhauled American democracy someday, it will be important to mandate vacations for workers during the voting window. That, among other measures, will be needed to safeguard the future from fascism.

this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
638 points (98.6% liked)

politics

31342 readers
3128 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS