this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
3147 points (98.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43962 readers
1343 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Egon@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

m simply stating the observation that there are other nationalities who not only might serve as a spark or derivative for whatever the American media

What does this have to do with a discussion about North Korea as presented by American media? You are not engaging with the argument or the points, you are not even relating it to your own, you are instead reframing the discussion to be about something else - You are moving the goalposts.

Never did I imply I was only talking about things because America was the one doing the narrating though.
dawg your alleged sources were all American media.

Oh hey you managed to find one whole article! Good on you! Is that article the sources you mentioned? I just wanna be sure that I'm not missing out.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I never said this discussion necessitated the American media, as opposed to just their doings, did I?

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You initiated this with the framework of American media. Now that that media has been critiqued, you are trying to reframe the discussion to one that is being more general, rather than actually engage with the argument put forth or acknowledge in any way what I have been saying. You are not engaging with my argument, you are trying to avoid it by making the discussion be about something else.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can’t reframe what was never framed to begin with. I am not changing the rules on anything.

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jesus fucking Christ, you libs are so fucking dense it is incredible. Try for once to engage in good faith in a discussion, it might do you so e good

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Egon@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Youre being a lib and you support lib ideology. Doesn't matter what you identify as

Point to where I said anything in defense of Liberalism in particular.