390
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 86 points 7 months ago

When is one of these state governors going to just straight up say "what ICE is doing is illegal and unconstitutional. we won't let you do this. leave now or be shot on sight by real law enforcement"? Just going "nooo, please don't do thiiiiis" while armed masked thugs kill people in your streets isn't doing shit to people who don't care about the law and think they'll always be in power.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 44 points 7 months ago

Do you honestly think the cops are going to do anything?

They will just refuse to enforce the laws they disagree with while playing games on their phones and looking for black people to assault. Same as always.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 30 points 7 months ago

Okay, so open citizen enrollment and empower them to. Probably could get a volunteer force with no pay at this point.

[-] TheMadCodger@piefed.social 3 points 7 months ago

Not that I disagree with the sentiment, but that would "officially" start the second American civil war. And despite the fact that we've basically already begun it, the politicians are all hoping things aren't really that bad and we can vote our way out and everything will go back to normal.

There needs to be a much bigger demonstration by the people before they risk anything.

You are right. We at only "unofficially" at war so the people are the ones dying

We wouldn't want Nazi cop blood spilled.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

“what ICE is doing is illegal and unconstitutional. we won’t let you do this. leave now or be shot on sight by real law enforcement”?

Law enforcement would likely not execute this order even if given it.

[-] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 7 months ago

Which, if anything, is evidence the police should have been fired and the whole system retooled a long time ago.

I'll stop beating around the bush and just say it: I know why dems won't stand up to MAGA no matter what ICE does to their constituents. It's because they're as greedy and authoritarian as the rest, just wearing a mask of civility and wielding softer power. They're letting it happen because they will find a way to enrich themselves regardless.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Which, if anything, is evidence the police should have been fired and the whole system retooled a long time ago.

Of course, but until qualified immunity is repealed, Democrats have plenty of (non-conspiratorial) motivation not to give police orders that they know the police won't follow: it makes them look like weaklings.

Both parties pretend that law enforcement is under democratic control. It is not.

Republicans obtain the loyalty of law enforcement by catering to their demands, providing them moral support, taking their side in nearly all disputes, and telling them they can do "whatever the hell they want" to quote Trump. Republicans are less afraid of what the police might do when unleashed, and are reasonably certain that the police will follow their orders because of all of this.

It also helps that what Republicans would order a LEO to do are the things they already want to do (i.e., harass, arrest, and even murder brown people, liberals, and anyone else who gives them lip).

[-] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 7 months ago

Both parties pretend that law enforcement is under democratic control. It is not.

There are options.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I don't think Americans are even willing to admit to themselves that law enforcement, even in ocean blue regions, are not under democratic control and the orders elected officials give them are mainly suggestions.

I understand not wanting to believe this as it is deeply disturbing. But things cannot be changed until basic realities are understood.

I would say that while neither group is under full democratic control, that local and state LEOs are at least hemmed in somewhat by often living amongst those they are policing and are usually experienced enough to know that following some of their most block-headed instincts (e.g., no knock, no announcement entries into residences) will earn you a bullet in the face as if you are a home invader, and that if the shooter survives the encounter, the system will likely let the person who put the bullet in you walk.

ICE are brazen because while they are not a new force, they haven't had significant enough field experience in America to know that rules of engagement aren't followed solely to protect the people subject to your patrols.

[-] dondelelcaro@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Case in point, look at the LA county sheriffs. Known to be home to multiple gang members from at least 1970.

Police are rarely under the strong (or even weak) control of elected representatives in the United States (and probably anywhere.)

[-] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago

Trump wants escalation and violence. Then he can use the Insurrection Act and it’s all over. Remember these are swing states being targeted.

Not saying any of this is ok or justified, but it is part of a pressure cooker strategy and all the state governors know it.

[-] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 7 months ago

I got news for ya: the martial law and brutal oppression of all American people is inevitable if MAGA isn't stopped. It's not a matter of them only doing it if we get out of hand. Every day is another step they take toward the goal of total subjugation.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Honestly? I agree.

But you also have to pick and choose a battlefield, as it were. The christofacists have pretty much the entirety of the news media behind them. That is why people globally insist "nobody is resisting" because... those protests never get any air time. And it is nothing new. Look how fast the news media was to condemn Trayvon Martin (and the many others like him) as violent gangbanging thugs while completely ignoring the lunatic who stalked and murdered him.

Look at Minnesota. The people being murdered are poets and nurses. And that is building up outrage to the point that even the news media can't run a smear campaign fast enough to stop (localized) general strikes.

Contrast that with gunning down people who are screaming "wildcats" and shooting back. It becomes "both sides are bad" and we roll in the military to make sure there is no more unrest. And while the LA Riots were not as violent as the media wanted to portray... there was a LOT of footage to distract people from Rodney King.


As a bit of hope, I suggest people look at how the Influencers are handling this. No, not fucking Hasan. Outlets like MinnMax are a great case study. Roll back two years and Ben Hanson was more or less stiill toeing the Gamergate era line of "we are apolitical and here to enjoy games". But as things have gotten much worse, he (caught up with some of his contemporaries) and has become explicitly political and making sure that the audience is aware of what is going on in Minneapolis.

Yes, doing a fundraiser... is a real liberal ass thing to do. But the point is less the money (which genuinely does help) and more forcing people to understand what is going on. Because it is way too easy to duck into our comfort zones when the world is collapsing around us... we have been doing that for decades. But when those comfort zones make sure people understand? It stops being "Ugh, fucking Anderson Cooper is yapping again" and instead becomes "My online personality I have a parasocial relationship with is just a normal person like me. Why are they worried?"

And... that goes a LONG way towards doing what the news media SHOULD be doing. So that when the next person is murdered... because there will be a next one, people understand that it is a human being who was killed and not some fentanyl dealing monster who just happens to look like a school teacher.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago

There are more ICE/CBP personnel in Minneapolis than state and local law enforcement combined.

Even if the Minnesota FOP hadn't explicitly endorsed ICE, they still wouldn't have the numbers to do anything about it...

[-] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 7 months ago

ICE didn't teleport into the state. They're not all standing in the same place at the same time. There are options. I mean, other than flopping on the floor and going "NOOOOO" like Stewart on Mad TV.

[-] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago

The option you are seeing is the one that the people of Minneapolis (who experienced violent unrest related to policing in their city recently) have chosen.

The people out there protecting their neighbors in MSP are showing incredible guts, cleverness, and solidarity.

So sure dump on the people who voted for this, dump on useless cops, but the private citizens of that area have stepped the fuck up and are putting their bodies on the line for their community.

What the people in MSP has nothing to do with a lack of courage and if you can't see that you need to take a nap and wipe your eyes.

[-] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 months ago

Oh the people are doing just fine. It's the people they elected who are doing fuck-all and I'm tired of them letting the federal government tread on their constituents.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 months ago

Okay? They didn't have to teleport into the state to have 3000 ~~agents~~ armed thugs in Minneapolis.

You've seen the numbers they show up in, right? They basically swarm each area they visit. Even if you redirect enough local law enforcement to present a forceful deterrent, another ICE posse will just pop up somewhere else and wreak havoc.

They have more numbers, and that's a plain fact that you have to recognize because no amount of wishful thinking will get around it.

If you can get a few thousand armed Minnesotans to communicate with each other, coordinate in an organized fashion, and patrol the city and outlying neighborhoods in large enough groups to present an effective deterrent, then that's an option. But good luck making that a reality...

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Well... The governors are gonna get a lot of flak from their constituents when Trump responds by calling in the Marines and the Army.

I think that's the main reason it hasn't happened.

When it does happen (and I expect it will at some point), I just hope Trump leaves the Air Force out of it... I dread the possibility of that bastard launching air strikes on political opponents while they sleep.

this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2026
390 points (99.7% liked)

News

39221 readers
3231 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS