Any thought on this? (www.anarchistfederation.net)

submitted 7 months ago by stepan@lemmy.cafe to c/anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I strongly disagree with the text. I understand it as the author doesn't want the people of Iran to liberate themselves from tyranny, because then they would be controlled by US which is also tyrannic. But not supporting people liberating themselves because one feels like they know better than the people seems just like the imperialist logic, just reversed. What are your thoughts? Does the text reflect common opinion among anarchists?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The only argument against an outside intervention

There are many arguments against an imperial invasion: Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Vietnam, Chile, Venezuela, etc, etc etc. Every single one of these massacres was done for the "benefit" of those invaded.

the latest mass killing of protestors

Please don't recycle fake imperial propaganda. The mass killings will come with the imperial invasion as usual.

https://the307.substack.com/p/how-atrocity-propaganda-manufactures

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago

Please don't recycle fake campist propaganda. Even the Iranian government itself talks about more than 3000 people killed.

this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026

6 points (87.5% liked)

Anarchism

3295 readers

116 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.

Other anarchist comms

Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

Banner by @Val@anarchist.nexus

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com