view the rest of the comments
Technology
News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.
What doesn't fit here?
The core of the story has to be technology focused.
- If article mentions "AI" in a sentence and then talks about business economics that doesn't make it tech news.
- Gaming is too many layers removed from technology. There are many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Transporation is too many layers removed from technology. EVs while use many cool technologies have many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Entertainment is too many layers removed from technology. While sometimes it can fit here, business or cultural aspects of it are a better fit for dedicated communities.
- Cybersecurity. While it heavily focuses on technology, most of the time it's too technical for most people who are not already invested in it. Should be posted in a dedicated communities unless it has broader connection to other tech areas.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
All of this would have been easily avoided by its users if they had just listened to the enlightened and switched to vim
I'd rather never turn my computer on again and run away to live in the woods than use notepad++
Vim is a chore to learn, most people just want simple notepad replacement when they don't need full IDE.
Vim is hardly an IDE unless you have added a shitload of plugins (which is fine if you want to do that, arguably a plus to have the option)
Notepad++ is way too bloated for a "simple notepad replacement" and often lacking when you need something more serious than that
Although I guess vim never shipped with malware, so I guess it's lacking in that particular notepad++ feature
I feel like you misunderstood me on purpose... Most people use Notepad++ in conjunction with IDE not as replacement for it.
Vim doesn't work as simple text editor without spending enourmous amount of time learning all the commands. Even long time users have cheat sheets nearby...
Notepad++ works for many people despite the bloat. Anyone can start immediately, no guidance needed, can't say the same for vim.
Well vim instead shipped vulnerability that allows arbitrary code execution (CVE-2025-66476)... So I guess both are not perfect.
Funnily enough I thought you were playing along with the bit, so I guess I misunderstood
Figured "enlightened vim user" was a bit more of a giveaway than it apparently is
Can you give examples where you think it's too bloated and where it lacks features in comparison to vim?