this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
39 points (100.0% liked)

movies

3798 readers
326 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They could release all their assets to the public domain after 20 years, stop going after people for fair use of their IP, charge street pricing at their parks, and make sure the people that actually do work at the company are paid well enough to live nicely regardless of their exact JD.

They won't, but they could.

[–] muffedtrims@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

But if they did that it would mean less dividends for the shareholders. Please, someone think of the shareholders.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

They actually can't. It's not a private company and they have a legally binding fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They actually can. They just have to convince their shareholders that those pro consumer changes would cost less in enforcement battles and increase revenue by bringing in more customers.

I'd be more likely to stop boycotting Disney if they made those changes and I'm not alone in that.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Unfortunately we're a minority. You can tell by the profits.