461
submitted 6 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Speaking for myself, I intend to show up as if success is the only possibility, and I suggest the same to any American.

It's far too early to guess the outcome one way or another, and anyone who claims otherwise is a fool, whether they belong to a thinktank or a sports bar.

But assuming failure is a lazy, shitty place from which to encourage people, including myself, to do their best to stop it.

[-] Rhoeri@piefed.world -3 points 6 months ago

The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it

~ George Bernard Shaw

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It’s not going to fail.

Your own future-looking statement; 100% predictive.

*"The power of accurate observation . . ."

Your comeback, lol.

"'Accurate observation' is only applicable to the present and past. Try harder when borrowing false intellectual authentication from old quotes."

~ Me, just now

[-] Rhoeri@piefed.world -4 points 6 months ago

Try reading it again and this time, pay attention to the context instead of thinking up edgy shit to respond with.

I’ll bet it makes more sense.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Says the month old account full of brief low-effort posts insisting that any resistance will fail. You know, like the one I just called you out on.

It's not my comprehension at fault here, kid. It's your agenda. I don't want fascism to succeed in my country. You want people to feel too discouraged to even think about resisting. And I'm here to put a cold boot in that wherever I see it.

Don't need no old quote for that. And George Bernard Shaw was a questionable source to start with.

Shaw was a poseur and a puritan; he was similarly a bourgeois and an antibourgeois writer, working for Hearst and posterity; his didacticism is entertaining and his pranks are purposeful; he supports socialism and is tempted by fascism.

—Leonard Feinberg, The Satirist (2006)

As I said, try harder.

[-] Rhoeri@piefed.world -4 points 6 months ago

Dude. I’ve been here for years. Check my .world account.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Dude. Piefed.world is also a .world account, or hadn't you noticed?

Also, seems like you have stopped trying to defend the indefensible, which is a plus. But go ahead, quote another fascist-lite to me in defense of your position.

[-] Rhoeri@piefed.world -3 points 6 months ago
this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
461 points (99.6% liked)

politics

31022 readers
1099 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS