218
submitted 6 months ago by pylapp@programming.dev to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

About enshitification, open source and AI pollution

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu 13 points 6 months ago

Really awful website with more ads and shit than content.

Nevertheless worrysome and indeed food for tough. Ai is here to stay, so we all need to find ways to deal with it, that we like it or not.

Maybe specialized humans in detect ai slop? Because using ai to detect ai seems kind of hironic.

[-] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 months ago

There is the new vouch system too

[-] ttyybb@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Use ai to make code to detect and block AI. Actually though wish we could force an AI tag tat could just be blocked with UBO

[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

But what polices that? And what's to stop humans pasting in the AI code, which may look like human code, just behave poorly or contain hallucinations.

[-] Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu -2 points 6 months ago

Write tests and actually do the practice of testing every single line with no regression testing. That will solve the AI problem. Since if it does work, there is no problem. If doest work just remove it. If it does work, who cares if it's AI or not?

[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Maybe big companies and projects with lots of people do white tests, but indie devs don't. FOSS is not the well organized machine you may have it confused for.

[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Humans in the loop? Code would have to be read and understood by the human, in relation to the problem being resolved, and the rest of the code base it may or may not interact with... And that's difficult.

[-] Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu -2 points 6 months ago

If ai slip vibe code is so shitty, then it should be pretty easy for humans to detect it and shut down without wasting too much time right?

[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

No, it's shitty because it's complicated, looks correct, but actually filled with errors and hallucinations. Including libraries that may not exist, and that leaves code open to injection attacks (where people make fake libraries/dependies based on commonly hallucinated code, then package them with genuine FOSS software which is now playing cover for malware/viruses).

this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
218 points (99.1% liked)

Open Source

48785 readers
1076 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS