113
Epstein files contain explicit but unsubstantiated claim that Trump abused minor
(www.theguardian.com)
We keep track of the release of the files, but also to explore what’s already available, and why – with enough exposure – this could bring the man down, and who knows even his regime or the empire.
Want to start digging yourself? Check out our sticky post
(Subject to Change)
This community is run by volunteers so please don't test the justice system, as with all justice systems it is critically underfunded.
Oh Guardian. When will journalism ever learn that this faux fairness and false equivalence is exactly what brought us here.
The fact that the files were omitted is what’s important, not that some things may not be factually correct. If you’ve been violated and you’re talking to scary burocratic men who show little empathy and are known to protect the powerful, you might not be insanely factually correct either.
The smoking guns are that they didn’t investigate, and they were excluded or removed from the files. Maybe write an article about that.