391

The former president raised $4.18 million on Friday alone, the single-highest 24 hour period of his campaign to date.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago

Are we watching the same game? Are you in a parallel universe?

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 years ago

So far nothing of real significance has happened to him, and there are still opportunities for fuckery everywhere.

My bet is that it ends badly for him, but he's wriggled out of many many things before, and he has the House and SCOTUS backing him, as well as every republican state legislature.

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

Literally unprecedented 4 indictments more on the way, the evidence and witness testimony is incredibly damning in basically all of them, he majority of the nation is taking it seriously, etc

Nothing of real significance eh? Fuck off doomer, no doubt you’ve been crying “nothing will ever happen” since 2016

[-] HotDogFingies@kbin.social 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

I think you're misreading this. I've been varying levels of nauseous for 7 years now and every single hour of every single one of those days, I've screamed internally, "something is going to be done, this will get better, he will be stopped." And absolutely nothing happens. It just gets worse and worse and it's been deeply destructive to my mental health. It's emotionally safer to distance yourself from this. Pessimism is a shield against the arrows of disappointment.

I won't feel safe until that man expires while serving several lifetime sentences behind bars and all of his followers are shunned into obscurity. If then. Such is the nature of trauma.

[-] Telorand@kbin.social 1 points 3 years ago

I recommend listening to Legal AF. They're lawyers following the Trump case, and I think they'll give you some hope and a good perspective on how fucked Trump is (the episode titles are a bit clickbait-y, but the core information is good). It's helped me not completely give up and say, "Well, rich people always get off scot free."

Trump hasn't seen justice, yet, but he also hasn't been to court except to be arraigned. We all want justice yesterday, but he'll have to defend himself for real early next year.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 years ago

I said "so far" and that "it was likely to end badly".

Thought experiment: all the cases are thrown out on procedural grounds tomorrow.

Would you feel like the inconvenience of a few court dates, an embarrassing photo, and some expenses borne by his dupes corresponded to the gravity of what he is alleged to have done?

I wouldn't.

[-] HotDogFingies@kbin.social 2 points 3 years ago

I'm scared, frankly. We can all pretend we know what's going to happen, but we don't and we haven't the entire time. He hasn't been convicted of anything and a good 40% of the country want it to stay that way.

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago

Oh, well if 40% want it that way I guess there nothing to be done :(

[-] SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

The 40% that already tried one coup because he asked nicely. Who knows what kind of crazy they try now.

[-] flipht@kbin.social 1 points 3 years ago

20-25% of the country, max. And it's the same 20-25% that has voted wannabe dictators into office this whole time.

40% is based on his polling with republicans and assuming they make up a full half of the electorate. They do not. 50% don't usually vote, so you have to basically halve any percentage when it's just d vs r.

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago

91 indictments isn't insignificant

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
391 points (91.9% liked)

politics

31298 readers
2103 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS