446

Whether it was due to the early hour of the day or just to the blood-thirsty nature of the moment, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared particularly unhinged during the first official news ...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mcv@lemmy.zip 78 points 7 months ago

No stupid rules of engagement, no nation-building quagmire, no democracy-building exercise, no politically correct wars.

No democracy, no nation building. So what is the actual goal here? Just to shoot stuff for its own sake?

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 63 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Now I'm hearing that the commanders all gave their troops a speech about doing this for God and Christianity, etc., so it seems like the primary motivation was to kick off the End Times for the religious freaks.

So we're in it until The Rapture. Our entire world has to burn down to satisfy the fantasies of delusional religious weirdos, so the Sociopathic Oligarchs can comb through the rubble for treasure.

How about we just Rapture the entire MAGA leadership, and move on?

[-] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

I am an atheist, but if heaven and hell exist, they should know, there is enough space in hell for them.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago

No god worth worshipping would condone their actions. I stand by the wisdom of Marcus Aurelius, that I will live a moral life and reject any god that has a problem with it. Killing to kill is the mandate of an evil god.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 9 points 7 months ago

I understand. Whenever one of these psychopaths assume room temperature, I'm always slightly sad that I don't believe in their mythology.

When Dick Cheney croaked, I remember thinking that it would be really nice to be able to smile at the thought of him having his Welcome Orientation in Hell. Instead, I was just sad for the person who didn't get a heart because Cheney took it.

[-] Didntdoit71@feddit.online 5 points 7 months ago

Call it whatever you want...just...make them stop...

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

He just wasn’t getting that same high exploding South American fishermen anymore.

Tolerance is a hell of a drug.

[-] aquovie@lemmy.cafe 7 points 7 months ago

"Democracy" and "nation building" is just "occupation" by another name. So I guess we can take some comfort in that not being their goal?

[-] duncan_bayne@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Sometimes. It can be done honorably and with good outcomes; Japan and Germany post-WW2 are good examples.

[-] mcv@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago

Those are the good examples, and they worked very well. But ever since, the US seems to think they can replicate the effect by going in, bombing the place, shooting some locals, and declaring mission accomplished.

[-] aquovie@lemmy.cafe 1 points 7 months ago

There are very few absolutes in life. War is bad, until you need to kill some Nazis. Occupation is bad, until you tread that fine line between Treaty of Versailles (too heavy) and 1800's Reconstruction (too light). Statistically, you're almost certainly not doing the right thing.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Also, bold move to more or less openly defy the American ideals. The moral justification for a lot of what we've done is to further the cause of democracy. I don't think starting a war to bring democracy is necessarily the right decision, but starting a war and not even trying to spread democracy with it is un-American (derogatory)

[-] mcv@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago

I thought the whole reason for this was the fact that Iran has killed and imprisoned record numbers of protesters. That sounds to me like regime change is the goal here, but perhaps I'm wrong.

I certainly don't think they'll ever succeed in bringing democracy (US track record is atrocious there), but at least it'd be nice if they pretended to try.

[-] masta_chief@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

I have a feeling it's as simple as wanting to use all the toys they've spent trillions on over the years and just want to see big explosions and play war.

Imagine if our society provided taxpayer funded paintball/airsoft/bomb ranges so all these warmongers can get their rocks off without hurting people.

[-] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago

"real man" cosplay.

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

The goal is not to make Bush's mistake of setting a goal that they can later be held accountable to.

[-] mcv@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago

So just shoot the place up, see what comes out, and then declare that that was the goal all along.

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah, pretty much. I think they're really hoping for Syria, but I'm not sure they can achieve that, Iran is a much more unified country.

[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

Balkanization I think, but I don’t think that will happen because Iran has been a pretty cohesive country for thousands of years. So I suspect Trump will back down, or there will be a multi decade regional war, or there will be a world war.

[-] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I dunno, the author of this article is Iranian-American. I think he has plenty of information and insight on the situation, I'm inclined to trust his assessment.

[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

What assessment it’s nine sentences making fun of Pete Hegseth

[-] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I just realized I commented on the wrong article, I'm sorry.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 7 months ago

Blow shit up so Iran can't attack back for the next generation.

this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
446 points (99.8% liked)

politics

31535 readers
2677 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS