69
submitted 6 months ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/privacy@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] logging_strict@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's less naive than an anti-kyc license. It's very pro kyc, there is just a steep fee involved.

If said, absolutely no and the gov't says kyc is mandated, that gov't could have a judge strike out that clause. This license would not run afoul of such a law and judges are not going to strike out a fee simply because the effort and costs involved to obtain a waiver from package authors is inconvenient.

Don't think in terms of prohibition. There is always a way to yes as long as the govt or company can go against the interests of it's stakeholders and it's helpful being open to financial suicide.

this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
69 points (96.0% liked)

Privacy

5100 readers
226 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS