this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
731 points (98.3% liked)

Good News Everyone

4462 readers
88 users here now

A place to post good news and prevent doom scrolling!

Rules for now:

  1. posts must link from a reliable news source
  2. no reposts
  3. paywalled articles must be made available
  4. avoid politics & schadenfreude

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (4 children)

My sister is part of the 10%. The fucked up thing is that she's not an idiot. But she truly believes that AI in search is a net benefit. I just don't get it.

[–] StopTech@lemmy.today 13 points 4 months ago (3 children)

It certainly adds convenience when you want quick answers. But the road to dystopia is convenient.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

It's wrong so often that it just adds useless padding I have to scroll down from, since I always have to look it up myself to get the correct info anyway.

[–] Elextra@literature.cafe 2 points 4 months ago

I think it depends on what youre asking for. Some search engines, not always AI but sometimes, I ask it really quick questions and I get answers. There may be calculators, conversation tools, etc already in the search.

I.e. what is 42 days from today. What's the release date of X game, etc.

I haven't had the time to switch to kagi yet but I have DDG and was just too lazy to turn off their AI feature. Didnt really bother me one way it the other. If the AI search doesnt answer my question I just move onto normal links. Again, for simple inquiries it just spits out the answers for me without having to click anything.

[–] StopTech@lemmy.today 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Believe me they're hard at work trying to fix that. I'm hoping it takes them a long time but I don't count on it.

[–] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Fixing the fact that AI is often wrong? Or fixing our ability to scroll past it?

Don’t worry, I already know the answer.

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I agree but the ethics prevents me from doing it.

[–] StopTech@lemmy.today 6 points 4 months ago

Exactly my point.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There's a road? I could have sworn we were already there.

[–] StopTech@lemmy.today 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The road is behind us but there's more of it before us too

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago

It’s road all the way down.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I sort of get it. If AI was 100% accurate like Google search used to be, then yeah AI might be a net benefit.

But right now, they fucking tell us ”Hey this feature that gobbles up gigawatts of electricity and gallons of water might be wrong so double check it by going to the sources I've left here."

What value is that providing exactly?

Jfc...

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Estimating that Google search used to be 100% seems like a really big stretch.

Better, yes.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 2 points 4 months ago

If she cannot understand the gross economic and environmental impacts the use of their trashy giant AI models is, then maybe she's not as smart as you give her credit for.