this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
142 points (98.6% liked)

Europe

11838 readers
712 users here now

News and information from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] IratePirate@feddit.org 104 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

To be fair, he and his government have been working tirelessly for this. They've been

  • lying about the necessity of new debt (then immediately taking up unprecedented amounts of it)
  • promising reforms that never came
  • calling the working part of the population lazy bums, all the while preparing tax breaks that will disproportionally benefit large companies and the top 10%
  • fucking up and slowing down the transition towards renewables amid yet another fossil fuel energy crisis
  • copying the disgusting populism of the far right all the while claiming to be trying to contain them (instead of doing the obvious and initiating a constitutional review of the party by the Supreme Court)

What annoys me more than the man himself is the fact that everyone paying even a modicum of attention could have seen this coming from a mile away. And they voted for his party anyway.

[โ€“] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Pretty much Lets not forget "Reiche"

[โ€“] spechter@feddit.org 10 points 4 months ago

I'm glad for every second I do

[โ€“] IratePirate@feddit.org 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Hence I specifically wrote "he and his government". But let's also not forget: ultimately, it was he who put that poorly camouflaged lobbyist into her seat.

[โ€“] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 3 points 4 months ago

Can't we call it "corruption" ? Words do have a meaning.

[โ€“] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Pretty spot on.

[โ€“] Don_alForno@feddit.org 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And now that they're disappointed with him, polls move further to the right, so they still don't get the problem.

[โ€“] IratePirate@feddit.org 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I fear they aren't trying (or likely) to "get" anything. I think we need to come to terms with the fact that for right-wingers, there's nothing rational about their political decisions. Yes, they will rationalise it after the fact when pressed by pollsters, claiming they're mostly concerned about migration or the economy. But if you really drill down, you'll find that many of them live in parts of the country where there are hardly any migrants, and that the economic policies of their favoured right-wing parties would hurt them more than anyone else.

[โ€“] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But if you really drill down, youโ€™ll find that many of them live in parts of the country where there are hardly any migrants, and that the economic policies of their favoured right-wing parties would hurt them more than anyone else.

For example, most migrants live in cities. Many cities have strong Green and little AfD votes.

[โ€“] IratePirate@feddit.org 2 points 4 months ago

Precisely! Where do we see the highest percentages of AfD? Rural areas in Eastern Germany, which have been
a) hit hard by the economic shifts of reunification
b) have suffered from severe population drain because young people follow opportunity, and that does lie in the cities rather than in the countryside. c) hardly see any migrants due to a) and b), but are full of people willing to listen to a good scapegoat story that gives them somebody to hate for the conditions they live in.

[โ€“] Don_alForno@feddit.org 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

for right-wingers, there's nothing rational about their political decisions.

I agree. But what we're seeing is voter migration from e.g. the social democrats to the fascists. Those can't all be "hardened" right wingers (yet) who are lost to democracy. Otherwise, why would they ever have voted social democrat before? There's a lot of people who are disappointed with politics and feel that no government ever did anything for them. But they turn to the people who openly tell them that they'll fuck them over even worse.