630
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by yodeljunkmanenvy@piefed.social to c/linux@sh.itjust.works
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 3 points 4 months ago

No standard, no custom government specific distro designed for the use case and ensuring stability and consistency... every department can choose their own.

So similar fragmentation that underpins the issues Linux has with consumer confusion when trying to switch. There are too many options all with weird quirks that isn't an issue for technical people, but is impossible for the average person to wade through to find good options for them.

Maybe they'll specify more in the future, but at the moment it looking more like expecting each large government department to make fundamental decisions on their core IT infrastructure on their own, as opposed to a dedicated and specialized team with experience.

[-] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 months ago

I'll bet money they'll either chose Fedora, Ubuntu, or some custom distro.

[-] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

Fedora makes the most sense to me. But I can see how a cautious bunch might go for the perceived safety of Ubuntu.

[-] alci@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago

Fedora being IBM, a US company, would make it a weird choice for "we need to be less dependant on US"...

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Linux, being the Linux Foundation, a US company, would make it a weird choice for "we need to be less dependent on the US" but, Western Europe being a load rather than a prime mover is nothing new.

[-] alci@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago

I thought the Linux foundation was not a company... My bad, in the us , everything is business, isn't it ?

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Per Wikipedia:

A company is a legal entity representing an association of legal persons with a shared objective, such as generating profit or benefiting society.

"Company" is a vague almost meaningless term, like "animal."

The Linux Foundation is a 501(c)6 non-profit corporation. Americans are more likely to be familiar with 501(c)3, which covers charity organizations, such as the American Red Cross and St. Judes Children's Research Hospital. 501(c)6 covers trade associations, like the American Medical Association, the American Bar Association, the National Association of Realtors and the US Chamber of Commerce.

As a trade association, the Linux Foundation is not itself a for-profit business, but they have a lot to do with for-profit businesses. Maintaining the world's most popular kernel is chief among them.

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

Would a government choose Fedora rather than Red Hat?

[-] Kerplunk@mastodon.scot 1 points 4 months ago

@captain_aggravated @chunkystyles

Would a government choose Fedora rather than Red Hat?

Better neither, The Red hat owner IBM has given trump millions and bowed to anti DEI policys.

Debian or Debian based is a far better choice.

[-] Brummbaer@pawb.social 6 points 4 months ago

This makes total sense, since not ever department has the same needs.

Also these are work computers, there is no "consumer confusion"- you get what everyone uses, that's also one of the reasons windows is everywhere.

Lastly, if rolling out different distros is a core decision in your IT you lack Linux experience in my opinion.

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
630 points (98.2% liked)

Linux

5506 readers
2 users here now

Shit, just linux.

Use this community for anything related to linux for now, if it gets too huge maybe there will be some sort of meme/gaming/shitpost spinoff. Currently though… go nuts

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS