this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
13 points (62.3% liked)
World News
32378 readers
513 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's not actually journalism. It's an extreme left propagandist and conspiracy website.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-grayzone/
They are not leftists, they are tankies who are pro-Russia, pro-CCP, pro-Assad, and basically pro-every-authoritarian. They defend multiple genocides. They're fascists stealing leftist valor.
yeah just going to OP's link just half of the "popular stories" links are pro-russia propaganda nonsense, and the rest are bizarro tankie takes.
🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩⛳🚩
Do you consider yourself a leftist?
Yes, I'm a radical anarcho-feminist.
Would you rather live under the rule of socialist China, or capitalist America?
Do you seriously think I don't know what a whataboutism is? Fuck off with this disingenuous bullshit tankie.
I'm not even a goddamn american!
So you’re a liberal. Facts.
What the fuck are you even talking about. Go back to bed. I'm not an idiot and I'm not falling for your shit.
But you want people to fall for your shit. This isn’t Reddit. We’re not all idiots.
Huh, I think something finally clicked in my head!
Radical anarcho-feminism is when
Fascinatingly Radical 👌
Well, you got #1 out of 3 accurate. With a 33% level of integrity they just might hire you.
I'd love to gain a better understanding tho.
Maybe we can use this article to better understand our perspectives?
Can you highlight the sentences, parts, keypoints or conclusions, which you, as a leftist radical anarcho-feminist think are wrong, problematic, offensive, bad etc.?
No need to go through the whole article; just a few points and possibly a general explanation of your perspective on the discussed issue will do, so I can understand why the grayzone is an unacceptable news site for some leftists.
Your hostility belies your intentions. Just accept that you are a liberal. And that’s okay. Own it. But stop pretending to be an actual leftist while spewing liberal propaganda.
I’m not disingenuous. I asked a question you never answered. I don’t even consider myself a Marxist Leninist. You throw out words like they don’t have meaning.
You asked a completely irrelevant question to deflect to a different subject, presumably because you thought I was American. Unfortunately I've slayed a lot of tankies and I know your tricks. I'm not falling for your misdirection.
I am American, you are not. That’s irrelevant. Still not a tankie, and you still haven’t answered the question which actually implies the answer by deduction. I’m not trying to trick you. I don’t even care if you’re a liberal. I’m surrounded by them. They aren’t bad people, just undereducated.
Edit: How many tankies have you slayed in 3 days?
About to be one more. (In case it was unclear, this is a metaphor and an alt.)
You slayed me so hard, metaphorically. Now answer the question:
If you don’t want to answer it, that’s fine. But maybe think about what that means.
I don't live under and don't want to live under either, because I am a radical anarchist and don't believe in states or borders. So, I did kind of answer your dumb, misdirecting, whataboutist false dichotomy with my first reply. Hope you are happy with the answer. It's bedtime now.
Was that difficult? I understand, that would be my view too. But as an anarchist, if it was a binary choice, and it might be, I would reluctantly choose to live under socialist Chinese rule. They are not perfect. But they at least have nationalized healthcare and house their homeless. That’s how I know I am a leftist. But labels don’t really matter when lives are concerned.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-times/
lmao lol even
Left of center, highly factual reporting. Ok.
not the CIA
That may be true. But don’t discount that media disseminated under capitalism is also biased. Source