8
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by paraphrand@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world

Hank echos the conclusion I’ve come to in the past year or two.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

He points out the 3.1/3.2 read out on the bottom right is miles to target. When it gets hit, it jumps to 6.1 as the reticle falls off the target and instead hits the water. If you consider the camera is flying fast and sort of circling the UAP, the motion makes more sense. It does appear to drop like a slow rag. Balloons of this size still have considerable drag on their bodies when deflated because of the scale of these types of aircraft, but still, we have no reasonable sense of scale in the first place. The apparent speed looks much slower with the post-hit wide view and it shows some of the rotational motion from the camera craft.

this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
8 points (78.6% liked)

UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1581 readers
1 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.


New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide


Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.


Community Spotlight

Featured Posts and User Investigations


Useful Links


Community Rules


Other Communities

!uapmemes@lemmy.world


If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS