this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
958 points (96.7% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2364 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

GOP presidential candidate Nikki Haley on Thursday called the Senate “the most privileged nursing home in the country.”

In response to a question about Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) apparently freezing up on Wednesday while taking questions in Covington, Ky., Haley said on Fox News that the Kentucky senator has “done some great things, and he deserves credit,” but emphasized that “you have to know when to leave.”

““No one should feel good about seeing that any more than we should feel good about seeing Dianne Feinstein, any more than we should feel good about a lot of what’s happening or seeing Joe Biden’s decline,” Haley said. “What I will say is, right now, the Senate is the most privileged nursing home in the country.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 122 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Joe Biden's decline? Look, I don't like having great-grandpa in the Whitehouse or Senate or Supreme Court, and I think we should have an age limit, but there's no need to invent a "decline" to make a point.

[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 75 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And I'd press her on naming one "great thing" McConnell has done...

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depends on perspective. If you're a fascist, that list is quite long.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

This. He denied Garland to the Supreme Court. Then without a shred of shame shoved Barret through. He blatantly shat on a precedent he himself set. His supporters don't care. They think this is good.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

His unwavering support for Ukraine.

Or if you want a dish that is well chilled but much spicier look no further than the Anti-Corruption Act of 1988

Look at the Sponsor, then look at the Co-Sponsor, then read the Summary. Look familiar? 😉

[–] Heisme@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sad that “one great thing” now equates to doing their fucking job.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair, can you think of anything that would qualify as "one great thing" that doesn't fall under the purview of "doing their job"?

Like, I don't think the expectation is that he would have run into a burning building to save some starving orphans?

[–] Baahb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Assassinating hitler does not fall under doing their job and yet it would be a great thing to have done.

[–] Furball@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Your right that’s what McConnell should have done

[–] JackDark@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Now? Hasn't it always when it comes to the GOP?

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

In her mind, the blocking of Merrick Garland.