490
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
490 points (99.0% liked)
World News
41519 readers
219 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Debate about what? Whether theft is theft?
They keep those jewels away from the brokers because they're all hot and the countries they were stolen from will make a fuss and ruin that overinflated valuation of that cheap looking gaudy shit. Cultural reasons is a convenient cover.
Depends on whether or not you live on stolen land, buy products made with stolen labour, use services run on stolen resources, or enjoy entertainment expressing stolen voices on devices manufactured with stolen minerals, if your life is completely free of benefit from the human exploitation that permeates every aspect of the modern world, then sure I have nothing to say to that.
If not, well there's usually at least a little debate to be had about when and how people should reconcile and recompense such tainted benefits they have but for which they don't feel personal responsibility for because it was someone long in the past or far away.
Just to be clear, I think people and nations do bear responsibility for the legacy of their past/forears. I think the stolen jewels should be returned, but I'm also not in possession of them and I'm not British or from one of the places where the jewels were stolen from.
I also don't think it's realistic for the US government and non-indigrnous population to just return all the land to indigenous nations. So against a debate about when and how.