Linux

48323 readers

695 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r

125

The technical merits of Wayland are mostly irrelevant (utcc.utoronto.ca)

submitted 1 year ago by pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.ndlug.org to c/linux@lemmy.ml

197 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In response to Wayland Breaks Your Bad Software

I say that the technical merits are irrelevant because I don't believe that they're a major factor any more in most people moving or not moving to Wayland.

With only a slight amount of generalization, none of these people will be moved by Wayland's technical merits. The energetic people who could be persuaded by technical merits to go through switching desktop environments or in some cases replacing hardware (or accepting limited features) have mostly moved to Wayland already. The people who remain on X are there either because they don't want to rebuild their desktop environment, they don't want to do without features and performance they currently have, or their Linux distribution doesn't think their desktop should switch to Wayland yet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bookmeat@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I still don't know why people are willing to give up remoting so willingly. With X it was always easy to send your accelerated video securely over the network. Didn't Wayland drop this? How are people remoting securely into Wayland desktops now?

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean something like waypipe? https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mstoeckl/waypipe/

[–] bookmeat@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

This seems good. Is there a preferred solution for headless Wayland desktops?

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I mean, I think most people use xwayland to keep this functionality.

Agreed completely though, we need a better replacement for remoting, it's too useful.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Do a significant amount of people using wayland even want or need to remote exactly like in X?

[–] Cornelius@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

There is a variety of remote desktop applications that support Wayland, Brodie talked about them in his video regarding Wayland's lack of network transparency. Wayland does not need network transparency to be able to support remote desktop.