57
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Jiral@lemmy.org 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah, isn't it that they require everyone forking only office to include all the trademarks while forbidding everyone to use their trademarks?

I mean at least in their grotesque interpretation of the AGPL license at least. Luckily they can't intimitate Nextcloud any Co.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

I think they are legally in the wrong, trying to impose restrictions om AGPL, but I'm not a lawyer. Probably, anybody making a fork will ignore that and see how far OnlyOffice wants to take it.

[-] Jiral@lemmy.org 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I am not a lawyer either but I have yet to see a single expert side with Only Office on this. Among others the FSF aggrees with Nextcloud's interpretation and disagrees with Only Office's and they should be experts on AGPL 3.0, shouldn't they?

If Only Office were correct it would not be Open Source and then it would violate numerous licenses itself. If Only Office really go to court with this they are risking a lot.

this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
57 points (100.0% liked)

Opensource

6636 readers
343 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS