56
submitted 4 months ago by bleustenns@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Title.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kureta@lemmy.ml 23 points 4 months ago

It's an unnecessary layer of complexity. I am the only user of my personal laptop. I don't need fine-grained permissions. Linux users and groups are enough for any permission needs I might have, like docker group, audio and video groups, etc. I don't have any "classified" documents on my computer. My home directory and root are on different disks. I can easily format and reinstall my system if something goes wrong and keep all my personal data.

[-] custard_swollower@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

You don’t have classified documents, but you probably use bank in your browser running as your user. Maybe you use local mail program to send emails, also running as your user. A simple malware could add emails to be send asking your family to send you some money through online service.

And that’s easily done because the only isolation layer is user and group.

[-] nyan@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Not everyone does online banking (I don't), and it's possible to warn your family about scams. If the information isn't there, you don't need to lock it down. Of course, that just moves both the security and the accompanying inconvenience off the computer and into the real world.

[-] kureta@lemmy.ml -3 points 4 months ago

I really don't see how anyone can install malware on my computer. I know my way around computers enough to not do anything dumb. Of course if someone wanted, they would be able to hack my device, probably. But I am not a high value target and it would be a waste of their time and effort. In short, that's a risk I am willing to take :)

[-] Yoddel_Hickory@piefed.ca 9 points 4 months ago

So you think NONE of the software you use will ever get an exploit? "Not do anything dumb" only covers some threats, not all.

[-] kureta@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago

No. I mean why wouild anyone target me? I am behind my home router most of the time, without any exposed ports. I am not saying "SELinux is unnecessary". The post asked for my reasons to dislike.

[-] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 months ago

Plain and simple, with a supply chain attack.

[-] kureta@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 months ago

Yes. That's fair. It's an actual, realistic threat. But personally, I don't provide any services to anyone and my data is periodically backed up to my NAS and cloud. But that's me. I can imagine other scenarios that would definitely require SELinux.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

Your data can be encrypted with a ransomware attack. Including your backups. Your memory searched for browser cached passwords and account names.

You're not with the effort? The effort is practically 0 these days. Bots written by AI don't care. And your compute resources can be used to do more harm.

[-] plutopos@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

If your data is periodically backed up, that means any malware would also get backed up too

[-] papercut@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago

Having your home directory on a different disk is something that could've saved me a lot of headache. Can't believe I didn't think of that.

[-] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

I think it's becoming default on more and more Linux installers

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

It used to be. I think it changed at some point to make installs easier for new people who were used to only having a single C:.

[-] plutopos@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

Fedora still does it (and it uses btrfs subvolumes, so they're resizable)

this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
56 points (95.2% liked)

Linux

67743 readers
490 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS