349
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago

No, because ubisoft is a shit company with a shit product.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Ahhh so it's because one is a billion dollar company you like and therefore, can do no wrong and must be defended at each point.

Every billionaire is living off stolen wealth except Gaben because he has a nice product that I like.

You know when everyone was simping for Elon before he went mask off, that's what the Gaben fan squad sounds like.

Threatening and forcing price parity because you own the largest market share isn't acceptable no matter who does it and to whom.

[-] Senal@programming.dev 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You're conflating commercial competency with personal likeability.

The difference between

Steam is provably the superior platform and that's why they are successful.

Vs

Steam is better because I like gaben.


Defending commercial competency is logically consistent.

Defending a billionaire personally is not.

Now go back and look at what was being defended.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago

Do you defend Amazon with this kind of energy. It's super convenient compared to my local business and cheaper, Amazon has massive commercial competency.

Bootlickers, the lot of you. And I say this as someone who has a steam deck and mostly games through steam. I'd never defend billionaires and their money extracting machines but all it takes for most of you is a media campaign telling you Gaben and Steam are your friends and how they care for you. Pathetic.

[-] Senal@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I see, that's my bad, I thought this was a conversation, but it's actually a rant.

No worries, I rescind my participation

You go off king/queen/.

[-] vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 months ago

Every store has price parity to some extent. Every store you will ever sell a product in has a non-compete agreement built into your contract. Not only is this not controversial there's no actual reason it should be.

It is common sense that you, as a product producer, shouldn't intentionally sabotage someone you're selling your product to. It doesn't matter who you're selling your product to. It is optional to sell your product to a third-party intermediary in the modern era.

This isn't defense of gaben or whatever weird fucking fantasy you people have come up with, this is just how private trade works.

If you have a problem with this, YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE CONCEPT OF PRIVATE SERVICES AND CAPITALISM.

this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
349 points (85.3% liked)

Technology

88037 readers
3262 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS